Talk:Maryina Roshcha (Bolshaya Koltsevaya line)

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Dying in topic Problem with formatting

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 15:19, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
Escalator at Maryina Roshcha
 
Escalators at Maryina Roshcha

Created by dying (talk). Self-nominated at 23:59, 12 February 2023 (UTC). [added second source. dying (talk) 16:13, 13 February 2023 (UTC)] [copyedited. dying (talk) 16:47, 13 February 2023 (UTC)]Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   The source says Это будет самый длинный эскалатор столичной подземки. (It will be the longest escalator in the capital's [Moscow's] subway.) Its future tense unnerved me but I see it is supported by another source in the article: Не обошлось и без рекордов на «Марьиной Роще». Здесь уже установили самые длинные в столичной подземке эскалаторы — пассажиры преодолеют чуть более 130 метров, прежде чем окажутся на платформе. I don't know why you didn't provide this source in the nom. But anyway, the hook is verified. BorgQueen (talk) 13:46, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

good point, BorgQueen. in retrospect, i should have provided both sources in the nomination. i have added the vm.ru source above in response to your comment. thanks for bringing this up! dying (talk) 16:13, 13 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Problem with formatting edit

@dying There is a problem with formatting in this article...like an invisible object that has been placed right in the middle of the word "architectural". Cielquiparle (talk) 19:42, 27 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

fixed. thanks, Cielquiparle. dying (talk) 19:50, 27 March 2023 (UTC)Reply