Talk:Marlborough Fine Art

London Mid‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

new article

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article is new so please help improve it. I'm not an expert on the gallery but there are scores of printed profiles and reviews. I'm working on going through them. Warrenking (talk) 18:15, 29 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 1 July 2019

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. This is never going to happen and I see no reason to waste everyone's time. Calidum 18:09, 1 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Marlborough Fine Art → Marlborough – Brand Consolidation. This title is no longer accurate. KeenInsites2019 (talk) 17:15, 1 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Oppose Marlborough Fine Art remains the correct name for the time being as per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:NAMECHANGES. If and when we can see independent reliable sources using the new name then we can use that. All current sources are from prior to the organisation's name change. -Lopifalko (talk) 17:38, 1 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic