Talk:Margaret Peterson Haddix

Latest comment: 3 years ago by 2601:249:8F00:5DC0:29AC:4B28:32A4:636F in topic External links modified

Book 8 edit

do you think there should be book 8 in the series

no. Book 7 said on the cover "the long awaited conclusion to the Shadow Children series". íslenskur fellibylur #12 (samtal) 14:33, 9 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

"while lacking any as-yet-undiscovered science". I removed this line from the discription of Running out of Time. This is not a definition of science fiction. SF is much broader then that, and deals with both 'hard' and 'soft' science. RooT deals with social sciences.


How do you make a Section? I noticed the book "Don't you dare read this, mrs. dunphrey" doesn't have a page and i wanted to make one since i have read the book. ~Tayler —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.71.219.188 (talk) 03:13, 3 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

anyone know... edit

When the next book in the missing series is coming out? -thanks, cheese(72.130.138.253 (talk) 23:41, 1 May 2008 (UTC))Reply

The next book is called Sent. Proof: http://www.haddixbooks.com/books/found.html Omni Terra (talk) 02:25, 5 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Missing edit

I really think someone should actually create a page about The Missing Book 1 Found. It has already been released yet there is no page about it.Omni Terra (talk) 02:27, 5 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphanage? edit

Is this a vandalist's entry? If not is there a reference for this. Other bio's that I have read mention a farmer father and nurse mother and her father being an inspiration to her but do not mention an orphanage.24.28.15.22 (talk) 20:38, 22 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

hey i luv ur books u need 2 make more shadow shildern books they the bomb ur # 1 frend n 6th grade nicole —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.247.21.55 (talk) 01:03, 5 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Is She Writing the 10th "39 Clues" book? edit

It said somewhere she did...But is she? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.93.128.249 (talkcontribs) 21:26, 18 April 2009

Reference added and "Unreferenced" tag removed edit

Article needs a lot more work and updating but is no longer unreferenced. Author clearly meets Notability standards--Plad2 (talk) 21:25, 2 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Added info and several sources on lawsuit but this needs more work. In fact, there should be enough in that lot to write a book on her yourself if you care... plenty more where they came from. Consider it a challenge, from me to you, to find them :P --Jubileeclipman 01:05, 6 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Margaret Peterson Haddix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:28, 10 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

life is too long — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:249:8F00:5DC0:29AC:4B28:32A4:636F (talk) 00:34, 29 October 2020 (UTC)Reply