Talk:Marais des Cygnes Massacre Site

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Hog Farm in topic GA Review

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Marais des Cygnes Massacre Site. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:26, 16 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Marais des Cygnes Massacre Site/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gog the Mild (talk · contribs) 23:34, 1 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

I will do a little copy editing. Please flag up anything you are unhappy with.

  • "as part of a period of political instability" Maybe "as part of" → 'during'?
    • Done
  • "Free-Staters" needs disambiguating.
    • Oops. Fixed
  • Perhaps introduce Brown? 'The abolitionist ...'?
    • Done
  • "resulted in a pro-slavery majority in Kansas leadership" This isn't grammatical. And who or what constituted the "leadership"?
    • Is "resulted in a pro-slavery majority in the Kansas territorial government," any better?
  • "Free Staters": why the uppercase initial letters?
    • Both Free Staters and free staters are used, as well as Border Ruffians and border ruffians. Gonna stick with lowercase for all for consistency
  • "the Sack of Lawrence was committed by" Consider "committed" → 'carried out'.
    • Done
  • "several buildings were burned". Burned, or burned down?
    • Burned down, clarified
  • "a Veterans of Foreign Wars post donated the site" I assume that this means something to Americans. But it looks like a typo to me.
    • Yeah, the VFW is a big veterans organization in parts of America. My state considers the game of bingo to be gambling and tightly regulates it, but the VFW is given a special exemption to do bingo above the legal limits. Such is life in the Bible Belt. I attend a Baptist College that forbids on-campus dancing
I assume that a "post" in this context means something like 'branch'.
I really can't think of anything polite to say in response, but you have my sympathies. How long is your sentence?
A "post" is what the VFW calls each branch. I can change the wording if you'd like, Gog the Mild, but "post" is the most accurate word to use in this context. Hog Farm Bacon 21:35, 3 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Suggest a paragraph break before "From 1961–1962".

Gog the Mild (talk) 17:40, 2 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed