Talk:Mallee Cliffs National Park

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Former good article nomineeMallee Cliffs National Park was a Geography and places good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 16, 2010Good article nomineeNot listed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 26, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Mallee Cliffs National Park has no public access in order to preserve the mallee eucalyptus habitat of the mallee fowl?

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Mallee Cliffs National Park/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

This is a decent article, but it needs a little bit more work before being passed:

  • It needs a general copyedit - there's a few grammatical errors around the place
  • The "Geography" section isn't great
  • It could do with something on the history; a sentence in the lead and a sentence under "flora" looks a little bit odd
  • It's a little bit brief - is there anything more that could be said about the park's flora and fauna? Rebecca (talk) 05:14, 10 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Comment: As it stands this article does not have a real lead (see WP:LEAD). It should summarise the article and there should not be things in the lead that are not mentioned in the rest of the article.--Grahame (talk) 01:06, 12 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Comment: the article needs a history as well as geography section (see also Grahamec's comment); the geography section lacks location and area information. The reader does not know what the "Foundation for National Parks & Wildlife" is - it sounds like a private conservation fund, but is in fact a partnership organisation, and the land is under public management. The geography section also needs more on landforms etc. I think the GAN should be failed at this point, but that is up to Rebecca. hamiltonstone (talk) 02:46, 12 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Comment: I think is time to close this nomination, it is on hold since more than two months, which is far more than "a week or so" indicated in the GA review guidelines. --Elekhh (talk) 01:16, 16 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
I agree with hamiltonstone et al, and see further issues, such as the lack of accessdates on references. As a result I'm failing this article; it can be renominated when everything's fixed. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:34, 16 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mallee Cliffs National Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:12, 31 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mallee Cliffs National Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:02, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mallee Cliffs National Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:46, 14 January 2018 (UTC)Reply