Talk:Mak Yuree

Latest comment: 8 years ago by PRehse in topic Contested deletion

About AfD edit

Hi Papaursa, would you please specify the reasons for why the article meets the criteria for AfD? In which sense it does not meet notability? I have put the information as per information gathered from a number of references and sources. It would be helpful to know the reasons for AfD, so that I can amend the article to meet notability. Thanks. Tanweertalk 19:24, 8 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

I didn't say it met the criteria for AfD. This subject was deleted at an earlier AfD discussion, which is why I labeled it as a possible speedy deletion candidate. I don't have access to the previous version to know how different they may be. If it's significantly different, then it can be looked at as a possible AfD candidate--but CSD and AFD are different. Papaursa (talk) 20:09, 8 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your clarification. I noticed while creating the article that the it was previously deleted twice, and I didn't make any edit or contribution to those versions. I just started this article to write a biography of living person as per NP:Notability criteria. If you notice any statements that sound overestimation, please let me know. I will try to establish notability, if it's not notable yet. Tanweertalk 20:16, 8 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion edit

This page should not be speedily deleted because: I was aware that, previously this article had been deleted twice, during my creation of the article this time (I didn't even any idea how those two versions looked like). And I didn't make any edit/contribution to those versions of the article. I started creating it recently, with an effort to making a biography of a living person as per WP:BLP criteria. I have started this one from the scratch and haven't yet finished putting all the possible contents. Before creating the article, earlier I gathered reliable references and sources. And I have used those references here. I did not put something that might sound overestimation or underestimation. Please note that I am not an expert/connoisseur of martial arts and for that I might mess up some stuffs. I would surely amend the article if something wrong is identified by any martial arts connoisseur. --Tanweertalk 20:33, 8 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

If memory serves this version relies far less heavily on the self congratulatory super-soke websites than the previous one. There are some reasonable references to add weight to the Discovery Channel coverage. I think this article is different enough from the version form three years ago and makes enough of a claim to notability to avoid an outright speedy delete. A new AfD might be necessary.Peter Rehse (talk) 20:45, 8 November 2015 (UTC)Reply