Talk:M. Farooqui
Latest comment: 11 months ago by Evrik in topic Did you know nomination
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from M. Farooqui appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 July 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Evrik (talk) 17:16, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
( )
- ... that M. Farooqui, who had been expelled from his studies for having organized a strike in 1940, received his Delhi University degree in a special convocation 1989? Source: Freedom Fighters Remember. Publications Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India. 1997. pp. 87–88. ISBN 9788123005751. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/obituary-muqimuddin-farooqi-1235268.html https://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/farooqui-remained-a-critic-of-congress-till-the-last-197090401244_1.html
Created by Soman (talk). Self-nominated at 17:42, 13 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/M. Farooqui; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- slight reword desired
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
@Soman: Good article. Though I feel like a rewording would be alright since the article almost feels CLOPPED Onegreatjoke (talk) 21:29, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Some rewordings done, article now gets "violation unlikely" by Earwig. --Soman (talk) 19:14, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
- Onegreatjoke, can you please respond to Soman's changes? It's been two weeks. You really need to put these on your watchlist or otherwise remember to keep an eye on them, I know this isn't the first time I've had to ping you for a response to a DYK review. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:42, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Approve. Onegreatjoke (talk) 21:38, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- Onegreatjoke, can you please respond to Soman's changes? It's been two weeks. You really need to put these on your watchlist or otherwise remember to keep an eye on them, I know this isn't the first time I've had to ping you for a response to a DYK review. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:42, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- Some rewordings done, article now gets "violation unlikely" by Earwig. --Soman (talk) 19:14, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
