Talk:Lou Henry Hoover

Would her attendance at Stanford qualify her for List of Stanford University people#Notable Stanford alumni

She does not have the Stanford alumni category. Would her attendance qualify her for List of Stanford University people#Notable Stanford alumni? Ronbo76 12:18, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Her picture appears on that article page. I guess so. Ronbo76 12:21, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

unwelcome strain?

"As First Lady, she entertained frequently and at times threw together informal dinners on the spur of the moment, placing unwelcome strain on the White House staff."

What is this assertion based on? Catering and serving dinner to teh first family is what the staff was hired to do. They serve dinner every night anyway, an informal one is a strain? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.90.218.107 (talk) 19:07, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Louise?

Anybody have a RS for "Louise"? Wasn't her given name "Lou"? Yopienso (talk) 22:34, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

That is correct, her full and legal birth name was Lou Henry, no middle name, and not "Louise." See: http://www.ecommcode.com/hoover/hooveronline/lhhbio/girlhood.htm 207.245.185.204 (talk) 18:42, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Her son, Henry Clark, is called Henry Charles in the boxed information. Should be changed? kpeck1916 (talk) 20:14, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Her son's name was Herbert Charles Hoover. The "Charles" was in honor of her father, Charles Henry. President Hoover's name was Herbert Clark Hoover. The "Clark" was in honor of his father, Jesse Clark Hoover. It is uncertain why Jesse's middle name was Clark, as there were no other Clarks in the family. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.245.177.12 (talk) 20:59, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lou Henry Hoover. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20031209093334/http://hoover.archives.gov/index.html to http://hoover.archives.gov/index.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110602010935/http://www.ecommcode.com/hoover/hooveronline/lhhbio/index.html to http://www.ecommcode.com/hoover/hooveronline/lhhbio/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:09, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Chinese language ability

I'm really curious about the nature of the Chinese language ability of the Hoovers, a claim I have heard about for a long time. Here's my cursory understanding:

• married February 10, 1899 at the home of the bride's parents in Monterey, California (both 24 years old)
• sailed for China
• stayed in Shanghai for a while
• lived in Tianjin
• left some time immediately after the Boxer Rebellion in June 1900 (she 26 years old, he 25/26 years old)
• sailed away from China

Sounds like maybe a little more than a year and a half of potential exposure to Chinese. How proficient could they have been? Could they read? How were their tones? Could they write? Did their Chinese have any Chinese dialect influence? Did any Chinese people of that period give an account of the Hoovers' Chinese language ability?

I have no doubt that with a year and a half of experience with Chinese, they could probably have "conversed in Chinese to foil eavesdroppers". But in my mind, that is in no way equivalent to the statement that "Mrs. Hoover learned and became proficient in Chinese" or that "Hoover's wife learned Mandarin Chinese (she was a first-rate linguist)". It's a bold claim that is made in trivia books and second hand sources throughout the world and wikipedia deserves better than that. Apparently the Ambassadors of China to the United States at that time were Wu Chaoshu and then Yan Huiqing; surely they would have said something about the Chinese language ability of the Hoovers. I'd like to see some first hand accounts. Geographyinitiative (talk) 13:47, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Agreed this is a claim that should be well sourced. There is https://wais.stanford.edu/HooverInstitute/hooverinstit_herberthooverandchina112101.html quoting Timothy Walch, Director of the Hoover Presidential Library in West Branch, Iowa,

I would like to add a word or two about the Hoovers in China. As Ron notes, the evidence for Mr. Hoover speaking Mandarin is slim. It is likely that he understood what was being said to him in Mandarin, but could neither read or write the language. Mrs. Hoover was a different case, however. Among her papers at the Hoover Library is her English-Mandarin dictionary. It is clear from contemporary evidence that she not only understood Chinese, but also wrote and read the language.

So it looks like Lou was moderately literate while Herbert far less so. --Erp (talk) 16:58, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your response! My feeling is like that expressed by Ronald Hilton in that source (11/21/01):

It is remarkable that the remarkable Lou Henry Hoover could learn Mandarin from scratch (?) and write a dictionary in such a short time. How come?

Updated timeline, based on the quotation of Ronald Hilton from the written correspondence of Timothy Walch:

• married February 10, 1899 at the home of the bride's parents in Monterey, California (both 24 years old)
• sailed for China, made it there by April 1899
• stayed in Shanghai for a while
• lived in Tianjin
• Siege of the International Legations June 20 – August 14, 1900
• Imperial Decree of declaration of war against foreign powers June 21, 1900
• left China August 1900
• sailed away from China (both 26 years old) (never came back?)

Maybe a year and four months in China, plus maybe four months in transit; Ronald Hilton - 11/21/01:

The Hoovers lived in China just over a year.

1. Among her papers at the Hoover Library is her English-Mandarin dictionary.

   Wow. She wrote this dictionary and she wrote it while in China; sounds like a handwritten manuscript. What type of entries are there in this dictionary? Daily life? Geology? That should be included in this article with a citation to pictures of that dictionary. If possible a picture of some of the text should be added to wikipedia: it would be cool to see her Chinese handwriting. The Herbert Hoover article links to Standard Chinese, but Mandarin (late imperial lingua franca) could also be appropriate (History of Modern Standard Chinese). Did she use some form of the Wade–Giles romanization scheme for her dictionary?

2. It is clear from contemporary evidence that she not only understood Chinese, but also wrote and read the language.

   That's exactly the evidence I want to know about: let's see that 'contemporary evidence'. There has got to be something outside the dictionary itself that proves her ability right? Writing a dictionary could be evidence that "she not only understood Chinese, but also wrote and read the language" and that (as we have in on wikipedia now) "Mrs. Hoover learned and became proficient in Chinese" or further that "Hoover's wife learned Mandarin Chinese (she was a first-rate linguist)". But to say "first-rate linguist", wouldn't you need an assessment from a scholar or something like that?

3. There also is anecdotal evidence that Mrs. Hoover would occasionally speak to Mr. Hoover in Chinese during their White House years.

   Let's see documentation of that 'anecdotal evidence'. Who said what and when? Which specific persons (especially anyone who could actually speak some form of Chinese) ever said 'I was there on such and such a day when they spoke Chinese in the White House'. I imagine if they were doing that in their White House years, then they were probably were doing it between 1900 and 1929 as well as between 1933 and 1944: any evidence of that? Geographyinitiative (talk) 02:10, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

I would note that Timothy Walch as a published scholar on the Hoovers would count as a reputable source as far as Wikipedia is concerned (note wikipedia editors aren't suppose to be doing primary research). There is a bit in "Lou Henry Hoover: A Prototype for First Ladies" By Dale C. Mayer (also an archivist) where her husband states that English speaking Chinese addressed her in Chinese but him in English (page 53). She was also taking lessons and not just acquiring by immersion. I agree she almost certainly wasn't natively fluent and some of the hyperbole should be toned down. I'm not sure whether any serious research has been done on how much Chinese she acquired. --Erp (talk) 02:53, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

If you think that these two sources (Walsh via Hilton and Mayer) are sufficient to prove some kind of claim about her Chinese language ability, then that would be okay with me. But I do think that, absent more conclusive evidence, there seems to be a degree of hyperbole in some of these statements as they stand. Thanks! Geographyinitiative (talk) 03:28, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Another thing I was just thinking: don't you think she or President Hoover would have made some kind of statement about their Chinese language ability at some point? Was it an inside secret? Why do we have to walk this circuitous route of proof via anecdotal evidence: what about quotations from them or their sons in a news piece or a documentary? Just some thoughts.Geographyinitiative (talk) 11:20, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Would that necessarily be more reliable? People quite frequently understate or overstate their language abilities. Also presidential candidates tended to more reticent back then (consider how many knew about FDR's disability). Note we do have Herbert Hoover's letter on his wife's ability. --Erp (talk) 02:28, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Based on the source added on the 20th, I have made the following additions/changes: She made extensive study of both Latin, Mandarin Chinese, Spanish, Italian and French, /// Hoover studied Mandarin Chinese while living in China. Her Chinese name was 'Hoo Loo' (古鹿; Pinyin: Gǔ Lù) derived from the sound of her name in English. (You can see it on the White House stationery picture in the source). That's so awesome that she had a Chinese name! I think we should get that photo or some other photo of her Chinese handwriting onto this page. She seems to have been noted for her linguistic studies; might as well show off something of it on here. My edit on Baidu Baike adding the info about her name passed inspection: (夫人：罗·亨利(1875-1944)，于1899年2月10日结婚 （中文姓名：古鹿[2] ）First Lady Biography: Lou Hoover ．National First Ladies' Library[引用日期2018-01-22]) Geographyinitiative (talk) 10:44, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lou Henry Hoover/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Unexpectedlydian (talk · contribs) 23:13, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Thebiguglyalien, I'll take this one :) Comments to follow shortly in the table below. Unexpectedlydian^♯4talk^‽ 23:13, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello @Thebiguglyalien, the first iteration of the review is complete. Great article, well done! Only a few minor comments in the table below. Let me know if you have any questions. Unexpectedlydian^♯4talk^‽ 13:15, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

I believe I've addressed all of your comments. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 17:33, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you, that's great! I've made one minor change to the article regarding the civil wedding ceremony (just moved a citation around). Happy to pass this article now, well done! Unexpectedlydian^♯4talk^‽ 17:53, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Lead Y Early life and education Y Marriage and travels Marriage and travel to China Y London and World War I Y Return to the United States Y First Lady of the United States * Missing a space between [40] and "Throughout". * "Civil service" is wikilinked, but maybe the previous mentions of "civil servants" should be wikilinked instead (as they come first in the article)? Later life and death Y Political beliefs Y Languages Y Legacy Y
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Lead sections Y Layout Y Words to watch None identified Y Fiction N/A Y List incorporation N/A Y
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Sources and citations are in the appropriate places.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Source check I have spot-checked the following sources (only a few minor comments): Allen 2000 After graduation, she took a job at her father's bank in addition to working as a substitute teacher. This info is on p.13 of the source, not pp.15-16. Caroli 2010 Y Schneider & Schneider 2010 Instead, they were married in a civil ceremony performed by a Spanish Roman Catholic priest at her family home. What implies the ceremony was a civil ceremony? I've moved citations around here so all the info is correctly captured. Schwartz Foster 2011 Hoover lived by this belief, maintaining an active role in her husband's work and in her own humanitarian projects. This info is covered mainly by p.133, not p.132. Watson 2001 While her husband was the head of the Food and Drug Administration, Hoover took up the cause of food conservation. She began a tradition of leaving one chair empty as a reminder of child starvation whenever she entertained company. Should be pp.214-215, not just p.215. "First Lady Biography: Lou Hoover". National First Ladies' Library. Y "Herbert Hoover and China". World Association for International Studies. November 21, 2001. This link is broken for me. Perhaps it could be archived? "Lou Hoover and Girl Scouts". Hoover Presidential Library. Her work with the Girl Scouts led to her serving as the group's president from 1922 to 1925. ... She returned to the Girl Scouts to serve as its president a second time from 1935 to 1937. Source doesn't seem to outline the exact dates. "An Uncommon Couple: Herbert and Lou Henry Hoover". Hoover Institution Library & Archives. Y "The red brick dorms at San Jose State come down". The Mercury News. Y "Girl Scouts Palo Alto, California". Palo Alto Service Unit. Y
	2c. it contains no original research.	From spot-checking sources I am content there has been no OR.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	From spot-checking sources, I am content there are no copyvio or plagiarism concerns.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Article covers early life, marriage to Hoover, FLOTUS, later life, activism, and other important elements like language and interests. From reading the sources, I am content everything notable about the subject is covered.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Article is broad but always remains focussed on subject and her life.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Article is presented neutrally.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Majority of recent edits are by nominator and are constructive.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	All images are PD or have no known restrictions.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Images are relevant with appropriate captions. Not a GA criteria, but they need alt descriptions.
	7. Overall assessment.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 18:44, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

Lou Henry Hoover

• ... that first lady Lou Henry Hoover (pictured) was the first woman in the United States to hold a degree in geology? Source: Allen, Anne Beiser (2000). An Independent Woman: The Life of Lou Henry Hoover. Greenwood Press. p. 19. ISBN 9780313314667.
  • ALT1: ... that American first lady Lou Henry Hoover (pictured) secretly sent money to families in need during the Great Depression? Source: Schwartz Foster, Feather (2011). The First Ladies: From Martha Washington to Mamie Eisenhower, an Intimate Portrait of the Women Who Shaped America. Cumberland House. p. 136. ISBN 978-1-4022-4272-4.
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Somatochlora flavomaculata

Improved to Good Article status by Thebiguglyalien (talk). Self-nominated at 18:19, 3 January 2023 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

• Adequate sourcing: - slight confusion
• Neutral:
• Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: @Thebiguglyalien: Good article. Though I am somewhat confused. While your source does say that she was the first, I'm king of getting confused with Florence Bascom somehow. Though I think that's mainly because the source provided doesn't state when she got her geology degree, whille Florence says she got it in 1893. So if you can supply a year then i'd approve. Onegreatjoke (talk) 21:44, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

As far as I can tell, some sources say first American woman while others say first woman at Stanford. I'm going to stay on the safe side, so I've removed the claim from the article and I'm retracting ALT0. Good catch! Thebiguglyalien (talk) 21:54, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Onegreatjoke Just realized I completely forgot to notify you. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 17:11, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Other hook seems fine to approve. Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:29, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

I had an Easter egg hunt to find the hook in the reference. It is on page 136. Bruxton (talk) 18:43, 16 January 2023 (UTC)