Talk:Llanthony Priory

Latest comment: 5 years ago by KJP1 in topic Merge

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Llanthony Priory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:52, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Merge edit

I believe this article should be merged. It is a stub about the barn. While notable due to its listed status, it would surely be more suitable to include it as a section of the main Llanthony Priory article. Mojo0306 (talk) 13:40, 20 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Not seeing the benefit of doing so. It's a Grade I building, as are two other structures on the Llanthony site both of which also have their own articles, and warrants its own. I created it as part of a project to have an illustrated article for all of Monmouthshire's Grade I and Grade II* buildings. You can check out the, slowish!, progress through the links. Lastly, it's currently more comprehensively cited than the Llanthony article. It can certainly be more prominently signposted if you like. Regards. KJP1 (talk) 14:01, 20 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
Don't think there's any consensus here so removing the tag. KJP1 (talk) 15:25, 17 September 2018 (UTC)Reply