Talk:Liv Flaherty

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Some Dude From North Carolina in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Liv Flaherty/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 00:01, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:01, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead edit

  • Infobox looks good.
  • "write her" → "wrote her"
  • Remove the comma after "authority".
  • "on a soap opera" → "in a soap opera" (might be WP:ENGVAR)
  • Quotes in the lead are cited.  

Casting and characterisation edit

  • Remove the comma after "her character".
  • Besides that, this section looks good.

Development edit

  • Remove the comma after "Sandra accepts".
  • Also remove the comma after "(Eden Taylor-Draper)".
  • "afore mentioned" → "aforementioned"
  • "Aaron, and that both him" → "Aaron and that both he"
  • The phrase "she it would" in #Alcoholism_and_imprisonment sounds off.
  • "unaware who" → "unaware of who"
  • "show him understanding" → "show him the understanding"
  • "worked with British" → "worked with the British"
  • Is there a word missing between "tells father" in the last section?
  • Remove the comma after "wedding day to Mandy".

Reception edit

  • Remove the comma after "nominated again".
  • Everything is well-sourced so this section looks good.

References edit

  • Sources are already archived.  
This might be due to the sources not being archived at the Wayback Machine (the tool simply copies links to archives and adds them to articles), but I'll pass the article since my main suggestions have been addressed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 15:02, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
I meant that it literally isn't loading – everything else on both my laptop and phone are loading but the tool. I'll try it again later. Thank you for the review! – DarkGlow • 15:09, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
Now that you mention it, the tool isn't loading on my laptop either. Guess it's not working today. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 16:01, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
  Done removed Chompy Ace 14:38, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
  Done by replacing them with reliable referencing. – DarkGlow • 14:47, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Progress edit

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·