Talk:List of pornographic magazines
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Polly Tunnel in topic Using mag template
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of pornographic magazines article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | As this page deals with a pornography topic, you may find the guidance of Pornography and No disclaimers in articles helpful in understanding Wikipedia policy before making edits or deletions. |
Women's magazines edit
What about porn magazines for women? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.244.33.243 (talk • contribs) 08:26, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- This is mostly a fag list —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joe blow69 (talk • contribs) 09:46, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- Time to start "Marketed to heterosexual women" and "Marketed to lesbians" sections?
- On Our Backs is for lesbians.
- Bad Attitude was a "lesbian sex magazine" that is apparently now online-only.[1] Notable for being the first publication effect by The Supreme Court of Canada's Butler decision and was "found obscene, under the Supreme Court's new criteria"[2]
- bottom of Playgirl has link to Sweet Action Magazine. SAM describes itself as being "directed towards hetero women." --EarthFurst 22:02, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Playboy edit
Why is Playboy on the list? The talk page for Playboy describes it as more of an erotic magazine rather than full porn. You don't even have to be 18 to buy it, even in places with strict porn laws. Emperor001 (talk) 20:42, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Using mag template edit
The template:mag has been created for this list to provide an easy citation template using the same format as template:citation but without having to setup all the parameter names. The format is: {{mag|Magazine Title|Publisher|ISSN|OCLC|Website}}.
Unwanted terms can be dropped off right to left, so for example:
| Example code | Results |
|---|---|
*{{mag|Celebrity Skin}} |
|
*{{mag|Asian Babes|Remnant Media|1367-7284}} |
|
*{{mag|Skin|Unique Publications||37980569}} |
|
Using this is helpful rather than mandatory as it forces a style in standard use across Wikipedia.—Teahot (talk) 13:09, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
- It appears that this particular template no longer exists. Does anyone know if there is another template available for this purpose? Polly Tunnel (talk) 11:29, 27 April 2017 (UTC)