Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Magazines

"Greater Wilmington Business Journal" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Greater Wilmington Business Journal has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 14 § Greater Wilmington Business Journal until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 20:13, 14 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reliable sources noticeboard discussion on a zine/magazine called Indie Vision Music

edit

There is currently a discussion about its reliability. Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Indie_Vision_Music Graywalls (talk) 17:01, 15 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

No Clean Singing, Teeth of the Divine, Metal Underground, The Metal Onslaught

edit

I've started a discussion at WP:RS/N regarding these sources and if they are reliable. Input at that discussion would be appreciated, please.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 00:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Treats!

edit

Treats! has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:45, 1 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Portland Monthly

edit

Portland Monthly has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:48, 20 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Lobster (magazine)

edit

Lobster (magazine) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 23:01, 26 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Dragon Ball

edit

Dragon Ball has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:11, 27 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for WSJ Magazine

edit

WSJ Magazine has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 23:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)Reply