This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lenta.ru article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Lenta.ru. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Lenta.ru at the Reference desk. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lenta.ru. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080705145200/http://lenta.ru/info/team.htm to http://lenta.ru/info/team.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:46, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Fix the cited links
editThe following text: "The content was quickly removed, but can be found in Wayback Machine." used two cited sources which link to two separate news websites, and not directly to the wayback machine as mentioned. 2600:4040:2D67:7800:9199:E4D8:89C1:2D6C (talk) 22:28, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Blacklisting
edithttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki_talk:Spam-blacklist/archives/August_2021
- Yep. Pre-2014 articles can be whitelisted, but since then the site has been a disinformation site per more than one discussion. This is not a spam issue. Black Kite (talk) 15:26, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
- This article does not inform about it being "a disinformation site".