Talk:Landless People's Movement

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Ammarpad in topic Requested move 17 March 2018

"B" assesment? Really?

edit

This article was tagged today with a "b" assessment: I can't see any argument for this being "b" class. Its 5 k long, doesn't suitably cover the topic, needs to be wikified, is mostly based on references from the organisation itself, has no supporting illustrations or infobox, and assumes a great deal of previous knowledge. Here are the criteria: {{grading scheme/table|

  1. The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional.
  2. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
  3. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
  4. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but does not need to be of the standard of featured articles. The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously.
  5. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
  6. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.


  1. fail
  2. fail
  3. fail
  4. borderline pass
  5. fail
  6. borderline fail

Assessments are not a popularity contest: they're to enable us to decide what work needs to be done. By creating false assessments, we are depriving the topic of the coverage it deserves. T L Miles (talk) 14:52, 20 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Downgraded to start-class. Skomorokh 10:54, 24 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Landless Peoples Movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:00, 16 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 17 March 2018

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure)Ammarpad (talk) 15:14, 24 March 2018 (UTC)Reply


Landless Peoples MovementLandless People's Movement – It seems that the right name of the movement is with apostrophe. Some example could be seen here, here and in the references of the article. Goemon (talk) 12:14, 17 March 2018 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.