Talk:Kolbeinn Sigþórsson

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Requested move edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Favonian (talk) 13:21, 4 April 2012 (UTC)Reply


Kolbeinn SigþórssonKolbeinn Sigthorsson – Per WP:UE The choice between anglicized and local spellings should follow English-language usage. The anglicized version is clearly most common among English, as well as Dutch, sources. Google search Sky Sports archive Adam4267 (talk) 11:15, 27 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

  • Support. GNews has 1,340 hits for this subject. There are 26 stories with the þ thing, but none of them are in English. Kauffner (talk) 11:56, 27 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose; congratulations to Kauffner for finding a number of English-language sources which misspell the name. We here at wikipedia needn't make the same mistake. The actual name has the þ &c. The article should keep its existing, accurate title; moving it to a misspelt version doesn't magically transform a "foreign" name into an "english" name. bobrayner (talk) 13:13, 27 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Weak oppose due to WP:CONSISTENCY with Category:Icelandic footballers etc. FWIW personally I'm not in favour of either thorn þ or eth ð being used in WP:Titles, to me it's heading beyond diacritics (which are only a minor irritation to monoglots and particularly if French/Spanish/German, easily within encyclopaedic comfort zone, such as National Geographic MOS) and blessed by WP:UE, but when it comes to extra consonants, such as pre-1996 es-zet ß (good riddance!) thorn þ and eth ð are pushing into the cyrillic no go zone. However, let's be realistic, this BLP is inline. Someone has to propose a wholesale Wikipedia ban on thorn þ and eth ð to WikiProject Iceland, rather than just make one sports BLP stick out oddly. In ictu oculi (talk) 13:23, 27 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
I think you make a good point about consistency. An admin on another RM about diacritics made the same point. So I think this is something that needs to be taken up at WP:Football because, as you say, there's no point in having one article stick out. Adam4267 (talk) 14:56, 27 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
And we already have one Andri Sigþórsson WP:Football is very diacritics and even special characters friendly, I doubt they'll have an issue with WikiProject:Iceland on this. Interestingly both Sigþórssons have their thorn accepted by all the interwikis, it. pl. nl. fr. de. which suggests to me that tolerance for Iceland's odd two letters is growing in the EU. The only exception being Denmark, the old colonial master till 1944, where da.wiki has nitsched the thorn for "th". In ictu oculi (talk) 15:22, 27 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose, especially Sigthorsson. Several sources, such as UEFA, Eurosport and Goal.com, don't use the thorn but retain the acute accent. Britannica always keeps the accent marks in Icelandic names, and sometimes the special characters as well (Jóhanna Sigurðardóttir). Per The Chicago Manual of Style, the thorn is definitely acceptable in modern English, so I don't think Sigthorsson and Sigthórsson qualify as anglicized spellings: "Authors should use the correct Unicode characters for the ligature and for edh, thorn, and yogh, and should provide their publisher with a list of these and any other special characters." Prolog (talk) 18:39, 28 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose. Icelandic name. Not English. WP:UE should therefore not apply here. Jared Preston (talk) 15:51, 30 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose, along broadly the same lines as In ictu oculi, although personally I put more weight on accuracy than consistency. bobrayner (talk) 21:01, 3 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kolbeinn Sigþórsson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:57, 7 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kolbeinn Sigþórsson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:29, 4 December 2017 (UTC)Reply