Talk:Katherine Maher
Latest comment: 6 months ago by Gråbergs Gråa Sång in topic For the interested, some more media coverage
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Katherine Maher article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 6 months  |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 12 March 2016. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
| This page was proposed for deletion by an editor on 11 March 2016. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
 | The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
 | Village Pump(WMF) Discussion Request for more attention by WMF has been raised on village pump |
For the interested, some more media coverage
editConservatives trashed NPR's new CEO for being 'woke.' But the truth is far more complex., USA Today Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:04, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- That's an opinion piece from a non-notable USA Today writer. Not sure what's compelling enough in there to include in an encyclopedia. Fred Zepelin (talk) 16:41, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Is there some rule I'm unaware of where coverage needs to be from "notable" [sic] writers? jp×g🗯️ 05:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- I do think that this falls under WP:RSOPINION. OTOH, it probably does represent the conventional wisdom on the topic. I take Gråbergs Gråa Sång as having pointed it out for this latter role, rather than suggesting we use it directly in the article (as they did not). Russ Woodroofe (talk) 08:19, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- I did not, but I don't think it would be outlandish to use it as a source, something WP:PROPORTIONate in-text attributed (depending on how we use it) as USA Today opinion. I have no actual content-suggestion atm. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:26, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- I do think that this falls under WP:RSOPINION. OTOH, it probably does represent the conventional wisdom on the topic. I take Gråbergs Gråa Sång as having pointed it out for this latter role, rather than suggesting we use it directly in the article (as they did not). Russ Woodroofe (talk) 08:19, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Is there some rule I'm unaware of where coverage needs to be from "notable" [sic] writers? jp×g🗯️ 05:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC)