Talk:Kanuni (drillship)
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Cwmhiraeth in topic Did you know nomination
 | This article was created or improved during WikiProject Europe's "European 10,000 Challenge", which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help out! |
 | A fact from Kanuni (drillship) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 May 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2020/May. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kanuni (drillship). |  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:50, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the Kanuni (ex NS37/ Sertão) is the third drillship of Turkey? Source: "... TPAO has bought the Sertao drillship ...", "... Turkey had purchased its third offshore drilling ship ..." [1], "Üçüncü sondaj gemisi 'Kanuni' Türkiye'de " (in Turkish) [2]
- Reviewed: James Harvey Insole
Created/expanded by CeeGee (talk). Self-nominated at 11:15, 11 April 2020 (UTC).
@CeeGee: Long enough, new enough, generally within policy regarding referencing, neutrality and no copyvio detected. Hook is interesting enough, and easily verified. QPQ is fulfilled. Good to go, though I suggest (1) checking for typos (I found a few), adding an explanation why it was arrested, and adding an explanation for the origin of its current name (mentioned in the sources). HaEr48 (talk) 00:13, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- @CeeGee: Coming to promote this, I find the article a little confusing. Why did the Admiralty Court arrest the vessel? Can you move the sentence "A purchase offer for the vessel in amount of US$75 million was rejected by late November 2016." to its correct place in the sequence of events. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:20, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth:
Done. Thanks. CeeGee 12:19, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you, that is much clearer. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:31, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth:
