Talk:Juuse Saros

Latest comment: 7 months ago by Riley1012 in topic GA Review

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by Z1720 talk 03:02, 3 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

5x expanded by HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk). Self-nominated at 03:15, 26 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Juuse Saros; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.Reply

  •   Rejected: article has not been expanded 5-fold in the past 7 days. The article has nevertheless been significantly expanded (~2x) and has good quality. Maybe it could be pushed to Good Article? --Broc (talk) 16:08, 28 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Juuse Saros/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk · contribs)

Reviewer: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 01:23, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello! I will complete this review by the end of this week. -Riley1012 (talk) 01:23, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

1. Well-written

  • Consider breaking up the Becoming the starter (2018–present) even further because it is currently quite long. Maybe 2021-present can be another subsection with a title like Starter (2021-present)
  • Per MOS:ALLCAPS, could the references with all-caps titles (6, 14, 49, and 52) be changed?   Done
  • Saros played his entire youth career and first three professional seasons with hometown club... Add "his" before "hometown"   Done
  • He finished his rookie season with a 17–10–2 record, a 2.62 goals against average, a .915 save percentage. Add "and" before "a .915 save percentage"   Done
  • He began the season as the steadfast backup to Rinne but they transitioned into an even split rather than starter/backup roles as the season continued. Add a comma after "Rinne"   Done
  • Saros finished in fourth place with two first place votes, two second place votes, and eight third place votes. Add a hyphen for first/second/third-place votes.   Done

2. Verifiable
Earwig's Copyvio check passed. Sources are all reliable.

  • Ref 39 needs |publisher=National Hockey League in the citation template   Done
  • There should be consistency in the references on whether it's Sportsnet.ca or Sportsnet   Done
  • Are there sources for the Career Statistics section?
    • @Riley1012: At the bottom of the article in external sources it says Biographical information and career statistics from.... HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 12:20, 27 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • Spot check:
  • No issues: 1, 3, 6, 10, 15, 16, 21, 26, 35, 43, 50, 60, 68, 78, 81, 91, 100, 107

3. Broad

  • The 2016 IIHF World Championship should be discussed in the body since it's mentioned in the lead   Done
  • Is there anything else of note that could be added to the Personal life section? I noticed in ref. 3 that he has an older brother that could be mentioned.   Done

4. Neutral
The article is neutral.

5. Stable
This article is stable day-to-day.

6. Illustrated
The images in the article are free and have relevant captions.

@HickoryOughtShirt?4: Nice article, just a few things that need to be addressed. -Riley1012 (talk) 21:57, 26 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.