External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Julian Brazier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:43, 19 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Julian Brazier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:40, 29 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Julian Brazier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:07, 29 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Now-Defunct Website Citations edit

I've removed all references to the seemingly defunct website http://www.julianbrazier.co.uk
Unfortunately, this leaves several sentences uncited; anything that was relying on said website in this version: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Julian_Brazier&oldid=878256647
The website can still be found in the Internet Archive (https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.julianbrazier.co.uk) if anyone wants to go back and dig through old pages. 95.150.85.95 (talk) 22:56, 13 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

"in what was possibly the most shocking result of the night" edit

I have an issue with the claim "but, in what was possibly the most shocking result of the night, Brazier lost his seat to Labour by 187 votes in 2017". I think this is a very dubious statement to have in the lead section of the article. Yes it was considered surprising and significant that Brazier lost his seat given Canterbury had always returned Conservatives, but a) without a source for this claim it is rather speculative and unencyclopedic b) the possibility had been talked about and the seat had shown signs of trending awat from the Conservatives. Eg it swung to Labour against the national trend in 2015 and the Conservative vote increase in 2010 increased at well below the national trend. c) there were other shocking results. You could argue that yhe result in Gordon, where the Conservatives took the seat from third place and on a swing of over 20% to unseat former SNP leader and ex-Scottish First Minister Alex Salmond was much more shocking. Dunarc (talk) 23:43, 13 November 2019 (UTC)Reply