Talk:John Venn

Latest comment: 2 years ago by NRPanikker in topic Priesthood Question

Priesthood Question edit

This is probably a stupid question, but I'm confused by the four generations of priests in the Venn family. Are you supposed to take a vow of celibacy when you are a priest? Or is there some version of Evangelical Christian priest which is different from the Catholic priests? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 148.78.243.122 (talk) 16:25, 14 March 2007 (UTC).Reply

Hi - Only Roman Catholic priests take a vow of celibacy. Church of England priests (of which the Venns are) do not. SteveBish 23:45, 15 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Also, it was compulsory - up until the late 19th century - for teaching staff at British universities to be ordained. So every member of an academically minded family was likely to be a priest as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.156.55.52 (talk) 22:28, 14 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

That's putting it a bit too strongly. At Oxford and Cambridge it helped a lot at that time to be an Anglican priest, but it was not necessary for every academic position there. NRPanikker (talk) 22:33, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Venn family edit

Hey! can some one clear up which Venn is which? Osfan1011 00:58, 13 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Greatest mathematician lists edit

I just now deleted the newly-added, unreferenced material about John Venn and a BBC survey. If it's a legitimate item regarding Venn, then it needs a robust reference. Please do not re-add the deleted material unless you have one to share. The lists I've seen tend to have Gauss and many, many others ahead of John Venn. See, for example Eells, W. C. (1962). "100 Greatest". Mathematics Teacher. 55. and also this web page, neither of which lists Venn. My hunch is that such surveys and lists of "The Greatest" are dependent on just who is surveyed and when. - Astrochemist (talk) 11:01, 20 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Let me explain this one as you may see that, going back along the history of this article, I have been reverting these kinds of changes for a few years! This started at school when some firends of mine and I were debating the 50 most important mathematicians of all time. Now I used to argue that, purely in the field of mathematics, Venn probably wasn't as important as many others whereas my friends, probably just to wind me up, argued otherwise. Anyway, this kind of turned into an in-joke which they eventually brought onto Wikipedia to further wind me up. It is totally fabricated. If it turns up again, delete it without question.Icosahedron (talk) 13:58, 16 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the above information. I'll take your advice. -- Astrochemist (talk) 15:21, 20 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
This is quite plausible where the BBC interviewer would show a member of the public a list of candidates of English mathematicians, one of the few to be recognisable by a man on the Clapham omnibus would be Venn. 194.207.86.26 (talk) 01:57, 1 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Verifiability edit

Before adding new material, please see this page, and also the text box therein, for Wikipedia's stand on verifiability. The burden for verifying new materials is on the editor who adds such. - Astrochemist (talk)

Odd Phrase edit

When reading this article, the statement "the cause of his death was not specified." caught my attention. Not specified by what or by whom? Sorry I don't have any resources on John Venn, I just thought the phrase was odd. 198.150.183.44 (talk) 16:21, 19 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Right to Eponymity edit

According to what logic (pun intended) are Venn diagrams called Venn diagrams? They were invented by Leonhard Euler. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.156.55.52 (talk) 23:02, 14 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Venn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:10, 29 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Venn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:23, 9 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:22, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply