Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mr9560a.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Middle name

edit

On March 15, 2011 Jessica posted on her Verified Twitter page that her middle name was Suzanne. "For the record, my middle name is Suzanne. (My mom's name) Don't know why it says Marie on Wikipedia? xo."[1] I know Twitter feeds fall under "the sources that are largely not acceptable," but since this is Jessica's Verified Account and we're just talking about her middle name, I don't think this should be a big issue. EatMorePez (talk) 23:51, 15 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

References

Picture

edit

I found another picture of her, more recent on Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/blackberryimages/4923804378/. It says "some rights reserved and not "all rights reserved". Can we used it? I don't know how to put it on Wikipedia. - Sofffie7 (talk) 22:58, 8 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Jon Lovitz hoax

edit

Couple of links about the hoax she just pulled with Jon Lovitz to promote her new video, it caused enough stir to warrant a mention, don't have time atm to type it all up. http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/28/entertainment/jessica-lowndes-jon-lovitz-engaged-feat/index.html?sr=fbCNN032816jessica-lowndes-jon-lovitz-engaged-feat0844PMStoryGalLink&linkId=22799858 http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/entertainthis/2016/03/28/jon-lovitz-and-jessica-lowndes-do-not-care-31-year-age-gap-engaged/82338588/ JamesG5 (talk) 03:20, 29 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Also http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3513206/Jessica-Lowndes-27-strips-lingerie-gets-intimate-58-year-old-Jon-Lovitz-new-music-video.html http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/jessica-lowndes-jon-lovitz-faked-relationship-to-promote-her-nsfw-music-video-w200561 JamesG5 (talk) 04:01, 29 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
If it's a hoax, it's well played, and newsworthy. A passage that was correctly cited was removed yesterday. I'm not going to get into another edit war over this. Let someone else deal with it. WriterWithNoName (talk) 12:35, 29 March 2016 (UTC)Reply