Talk:Jerome War Relocation Center
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jerome War Relocation Center article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
To whom it may or may not concern:
The Wiki icon for this article is located in the gulf of mexico approximatedly 300 miles South of the state of Arkansas; where the article states that the Jerome War Relocation Center is actually located. For lack of means of moving the icon, it was left in the same place where it was discovered. 70.197.60.242 (talk) 22:40, 9 December 2009 (UTC) alan clayton
"Registration" statistic edit
I recently edited the section on the 442nd and the loyalty questionnaire, and I've removed this statistic
- "The final report of registration at Jerome stated that out of the 5,802 that were eligible 5,798 registered."
not because I feel it's irrelevant, but because I can't tell whether the previous editor means draft registration or is using the WRA's evacuee registration euphemism to reference the loyalty questionnaire. If the first case, it seems like this number is waaay off and should remain out, as Jerome and Rohwer tied for the lowest rate of volunteer enlistment of all the camps. If the second, that should be made clearer (and explained — did the 4 who didn't "register" refuse to respond? the loyalty questionnaire was not optional...)MartinaDee (talk) 00:00, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Jerome War Relocation Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060615080823/http://www.cr.nps.gov/history/online_books/internment/reporta9.htm to http://www.cr.nps.gov/history/online_books/internment/reporta9.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081120194707/http://southernspaces.org/contents/2008/howard/1a.htm to http://www.southernspaces.org/contents/2008/howard/1a.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:38, 24 November 2017 (UTC)