This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project in 2024. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
Latest comment: 3 months ago3 comments1 person in discussion
The text referred to in the thesis has a different title and year (1541) and is likely one of the popular almanacs. A different source is used for the claim at fr.wp (a Chinese professor), but that would need to be tracked down. I'll have a look and see if Huchard mentions the publishing house next time I get to the library. NB: https://journals.openedition.org/crmh/16513 Cheers. Thanks for creating this page.-- SashiRolls 🌿 · 🍥 17:25, 22 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
I see the publishing house has been added to fr:François Rabelais since last I read that page. The citation is still (Huchard, 136), so I'll check that to see if it is indeed mentioned. If so, Rabelais may not have been involved... except that the book the publishing house is said to have published in that entry was indeed his immediate inspiration for the title character of his own book. But, cf. https://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb31167619p which attributes the book to him the year before on a different press. -- SashiRolls 🌿 · 🍥 18:07, 22 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
After verification, (Huchard, 136) does not support the change to the fr.wp page so it has been removed. -- SashiRolls 🌿 · 🍥 16:29, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
