edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jacob Eason. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:45, 17 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Transfer report

edit

I added a link to a clear, reliable article that reports that Eason plans to transfer to the University of Washington. I don't think the article should claim that he is going to transfer, but I think the report itself is relevant. As the situation develops, we can update the article to reflect new information. Rks13 (talk) 18:20, 11 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Too much detail and too many cites?

edit

I spent some time trying to clean up the text and the citations, but I ran out of energy and patience. I think the article, in its current form, has too much detail about Eason's high school career. I suspect that nobody but his parents cares about his completion percentage in 9th grade. I also think that the article has too many citations demonstrating that he was a highly-ranked recruit. I spent a few minutes cleaning up citations, but I suspect that most of them should be removed rather than reformatted. Rks13 (talk) 18:21, 11 January 2018 (UTC)Reply