This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Albert Barnes' Notes on the Old Testament is not a reliable source, and his views shouldn't be copy-pasted into this or any other Wikipedia page. I removed the information copy-pasted from Barnes in the section on verse 1, but it has since been restored by User:JohnThorne without any edit summary or discussion. Copy-pasting in text from random sources is not how we're supposed to build Wikipedia pages. To demonstrate that Albert Barnes holds pre-critical and now fringe views on biblical topics, see his introduction to Genesis, where he simply assumes Mosaic authorship, a view untenable today: Introduction to Genesis. Alephb (talk) 04:10, 26 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
