Talk:Indian spot-billed duck

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Arbitrarily0 in topic Requested move

Eastern/Indian Spot-billed Duck edit

This article is currently confusing. Either it should be reverted to Spot-billed Duck to include all subspecies, or kept as Indian, but remove the Chinese Spot-billed Duck references as that pertains to the Eastern Spot-billed Duck which we currently have as a redirect, which we then can create a new page for since some tax web sites now split them (Birdlfe International, Clements, and Sibley & Monroe). Howard and Moore have them currently lumped but understand a new volume is out soon?....Thoughts??.....Pvmoutside (talk) 13:01, 16 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Requested move edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 14:52, 29 August 2011 (UTC)Reply


Indian Spot-billed DuckSpot-billed Duck – Current structure is sloppy. Article discusses proposed taxonomic split into Indian and Eastern Spot-billed Duck, but article title is listed with name after split has occurred. I propose to use former name prior to split to make aticle body and article title match...Pvmoutside (talk) 17:25, 22 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

  • Support proper name for the current treatment. —innotata 17:47, 22 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.