Talk:Hurricane Tico

Importance war

Rather than keep changing this, why doesn't anyone seek to find out exactly how many deaths it caused in Mexico? If it really did cause up to 105, as the article claims, then surely that would be mid-importance, as that would be one of the deadliest EPAC hurricanes. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:33, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

If it caused 100, those are still indirect. The project had already decided that indirect deaths do not count much to determine the importance of an article. I've used the example of Hurricane Stan often enough, because it is Mid, not High, despite 2000 fatalities. Potapych (talk) 15:42, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

No, they'd be direct. Those missing were from missing fishing boats, and, if it was like Hurricane Ismael (which also killed +100 people, many from capsized fishing boats), then it would rather important. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:51, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Check the Mantazan storm (linked on my user page) Leave Message ,Yellow Evan home ,Sandbox Happy Veterans day 15:56, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Please do not go off topic. We just need a link that says Tico caused all of those deaths. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:10, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Besides it caused by most rain from an EPAC cyclone in the Untied states unless Lowell produced more. Leave Message ,Yellow Evan home ,Sandbox Happy Veterans day 17:23, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Please don't go off-topic! No one cares about Lowell, and Tico was not the wettest EPAC cyclone in the US - that honor belongs to Norma 81. All we need is a link to prove Tico caused all of those deaths. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:28, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

I just found it here. Leave Message ,Yellow Evan home ,Sandbox Happy Veterans day 17:31, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

That source says 105 people were missing, not dead. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 17:54, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

I added the death toll, which was ultimately 135 deaths, derived from a reliable source. I upped it to mid. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:04, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Tico (1983)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 12george1 (talk · contribs) 20:09, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

• "After peaking as a Category 4 hurricane on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Scale early on October 19." - Sentence fragment; I would suggest rewording that to: "Early on October 19, Tico peaked as a Category 4 hurricane on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Scale".
• "Though, most of it's impact occurred in Mexico" - Change it's to its
• "14 miles (22 kilometres) in diameter," - Why isn't kilometres abbreviated?
• "Two 328 ft (100 m) anchored ships were washed aground by strong waves and swells.[11] with a total of seven ships reported missing." - Switch that period to a comma.
• "although mos tof the agricultural damage" --> "although most of the agricultural damage"
• "more evacuations to sheleters were anticipated." - typo
• To remain consistent with other references, switch "Roth, David" to "David Roth" in reference #2. However, I wouldn't touch reference #8 since it is with the "Most intense landfalling Pacific hurricanes" template.
• On reference #3, one of the authors is "Ethan J. Gibney1"; there shouldn't be a 1 on the end of his last name.
  • I fixed all of them with the exception of the last one, as I am having a hard time finding where the mistake is. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 20:43, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Ok i went through and made your proposed changes. I could not find the Ethan Gibney 1 either.Millertime246 (talk) 21:04, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

oh, looks like you beet me to it. Good workMillertime246 (talk) 21:04, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Ref 3 is with the ""Most intense landfalling Pacific hurricane" template. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 23:32, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

• Ok, everything is good now. That last thing I said was part of a template. Well, anyway, I will pass with article.--12george1 (talk) 01:47, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Refernces

i just found a lot of typos in the references. BlueTropicalWave (Talk) 01:54, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

No, there was only one, which I corrected. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 02:59, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

ok, but there are spelling mistakes too. BlueTropicalWave (Talk) 12:28, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hurricane Tico. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110611203748/http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/~cannon/thh-nc/mexico/mazatlan/text/sect7.htm to http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/~cannon/thh-nc/mexico/mazatlan/text/sect7.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110715160303/http://www.rdflanagan.com/Holdenville/Holdenville_Chapter4.doc to http://www.rdflanagan.com/Holdenville/Holdenville_Chapter4.doc

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:07, 7 April 2017 (UTC)