This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Horacio Rivero Jr. article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Puerto Rico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to Puerto Rico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Puerto RicoWikipedia:WikiProject Puerto RicoTemplate:WikiProject Puerto RicoPuerto Rico articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 15 years ago10 comments2 people in discussion
Rivero was also Chief of SACLANT headquartered in Norfolk 1960-1963 or thereabouts. Needs to be mentioned. I can't find a reference. Nor can I find a clear definition of SACLANT, one of the Navy's many hugely confusing and overlapping commands - I think it included NATO. Also the timing of his promotions aren't clear. When he was SACLANT, for example, he was Vice-ADmiral (3-star).Student7 (talk) 13:00, 27 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
We can't mention what can not be proofed nor sourced. Besides, the Chief of SACLANT (Supreme Allied Commander Atlantic/Commander in Chief) from 1960 - 1963, was Robert L. Dennison and from 1963 - 1965 it was Harold Page Smith. Tony the Marine (talk) 13:23, 27 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
I was at HQ from 1960-1962 and never heard of Smith which is weird. VADM Fitzhugh Lee was deputy CINCLANT etc etc. at that same time. Rivero was definitely there in a NATO-related capacity at that exact time. Please take note that I am still not inserting it. (Jimminy!). Student7 (talk) 22:13, 28 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
I made a mistake, Adm. Robert L. Dennison was Chief from from 1960 to 1963. Sorry, here is a site when Presdient John F. Kennedy presented the Distinguished Service Medal to Adm. Robert L. Dennison. Pres. Kennedy commented on Adm. Robert L. Dennison, who at the time wores four hats: SACLANT for NATO; CINCLANT, Commander of the joint Army-Navy-Air-U.S.; CINCLANTFLT, U.S. Naval Forces; CINCWESLANT, which is a dual hat within NATO of the control of the shipping organization. [1]. Tony the Marine (talk) 00:33, 29 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Maybe Rivero was Deputy SACLANT though he seemed to have more independence (unlike Lee) than that. He had his own HQ in his own building, which Lee didn't. Maybe somebody will stumble across a reference.Student7 (talk) 13:55, 30 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Tell you what, this week I'll check it out with a friend of mine who happens to be the curator of the Naval Museum. I am interested in finding out myself. Then I will post my findings here or let you know in your talk page. Either way I hope that we'll find out. Tony the Marine (talk) 14:08, 30 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Hard to argue. Looks like a solid reference. Surely they would have double checked that one lead statement.
On the flip side, he was a "Democratic" admiral, waiting during a Democratic administration for a crack at CNO. They obviously trusted him and wanted to keep him on (but had their own ideas about who should be CNO.Student7 (talk) 22:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply