Talk:Hasbara Fellowships

Fair use rationale for Image:Hasbara.png

Image:Hasbara.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 21:16, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

I think we have this all fixed now, with the image restored, an appropriate fair use template added, and the link to the image restored. --John Nagle 06:58, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

In the image template, I changed the "Low resolution" to Yes. It's not a high-resolution image, and per Template:Non-free use rationale, "images must generally be of low resolution" to be considered fair use. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 07:30, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Undue inclusion of wikipedia compaign

The website contains many items could someone explain to me why it notable and why it should included in to the article? If no WP:RS would be presnted this should be removed per WP:PRIMARY and WP:UNDUE.--Shrike (talk) 15:22, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

In an organisations article, it is not undue to report an organisations activities per its own website. The Israel Peace week activities are also cited to the organisations website. Dlv999 (talk) 15:34, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

So why this particular item what make it notable among many others?And how its not a cherry picking?--Shrike (talk) 15:48, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

More to the point, why are you kicking up a fuss about this and not the mention of The Israel Peace week, both of which are cited to the organisations website? Dlv999 (talk) 16:12, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Because there are actually WP:RS that make it notable--Shrike (talk) 17:03, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hasbara Fellowships. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150204000819/http://www.hasbarafellowships.org/homepage-v2/campus-resources/grants-3/grant-request-form-2 to http://www.hasbarafellowships.org/homepage-v2/campus-resources/grants-3/grant-request-form-2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:13, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Primary sources

I removed self-cited and promotional material; preserving here by providing this link. I also tagged the article accordingly for the remaining primary sources. --K.e.coffman (talk) 03:07, 28 February 2018 (UTC)