Talk:Harry Cobby

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Featured articleHarry Cobby is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Featured topic starHarry Cobby is part of the Command in the South West Pacific Area series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on November 11, 2011.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 21, 2009WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
April 27, 2009Good article nomineeListed
May 5, 2009Featured article candidatePromoted
December 23, 2012Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Untitled edit

Thanks Geoff, I was in the process of writing it when I saw the (trigger-happy) vote for deletion. Grant65 (Talk) 03:51, Apr 24, 2005 (UTC)

No worries. I assumed you were planning to write it. Just wanted to put something in place so that the other redirects weren't ruthlessly hunted down and exterminated. Geoff/Gsl 07:46, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

A Note on Ranking Australian Aces edit

http://www.theaerodrome.com/aces/australi/index.php, which contains a detailed listing of all confirmed victories by World War I aces, shows Robert A. Little as Australia's leading ace, with 47 victories, "Stan" Dallas as second with 32 victories, and Arthur H. Cobby third with 29. Cobby is the leading ace of the Australia Flying Corps, as the other two served in Royal Naval Air Service.

I have amended this article accordingly.

Georgejdorner (talk) 07:49, 2 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Information on how Cobby managed to leave the bank and join the AIF edit

In his autobiography, High Adventure (published originally in 1942), Cobby states that in order to leave the bank and join the AIF he "...put the hard word on the Governor of the Bank, pointing out that I [sic] had the option of resigning, or jumping under a train if I [sic] was not permitted to join up. He saw the reasonableness of my request, especially as I had based it on my getting into the Flying Corps". (quote from p. 19).

The full details of the source are:

Cobby, Arthur Henry. (1942). High Adventure: The Autobiography of Australia's Most Famous WWI Flying Ace. Reprinted in 1981 by Kookaburra Technical Publications: Melbourne. ISBN 0-85880-044-6.

Not sure if you would like to include that in the article at all. AustralianRupert (talk) 05:13, 20 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

The story goes that after hearing what the life expectancy of a pilot was, he asked to have another go at the train. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:51, 27 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Lol...! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 03:27, 27 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations! edit

I was delighted to see this article at the top of the main page on Armistice Day. Amandajm (talk) 02:21, 11 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thank you on behalf of all those who contribnuted to getting it there! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 04:57, 11 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

North-Eastern Area edit

Was Cobby the AOC North-Eastern Area or the AOC North-Eastern Area Headquarters? It may be that there is no distinction but http://www.ozatwar.com/fedplace.htm seems to indicate that the Commander of North-Eastern Area was a USAAF 2 star while Cobby as COS (also titled as AOC North-Eastern Area Headquarters) was a RAAF 1 star. Greenshed (talk) 18:49, 11 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi mate. There was effectively no distinction between AOC North-Eastern Area (also referred to as North-Eastern Area Command) and AOC North-Eastern Area Headquarters. I did see you adding links to that stub in a few articles I've worked on like Lukis and McLachlan. Couple of things... From memory Ozatwar, though useful in its own way, wouldn't be regarded as a reliable source on WP. Also I'm at present working on an all-encompassing article on the RAAF Area Command system which should end up being a better link for all similar commands like North-Western Area, Southern Area, etc. So my suggestion is not link any more articles to that NEA stub as it would be subsumed by the relevant section in my forthcoming Area Commands article. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 21:24, 11 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Greetings. I accept that Ozatwar may not be regarded as a reliable source and as such I did not use it for in-line referencing. While I have yet to look up WP policy on whether there is a lower standard for external links than for references, I do not feel too strongly about this issue. In any case sources which do not meet the article-space bar can still inform discussions on pages such as this. Looking at the article on Ralph Royce, there is no mention of Royce being appointed as the commander of North-Eastern Area. I take it from you comments that Cobby was AOC North-Eastern Area and that Ozatwar incorrectly states that Royce was the commander. I look forward to your article on the RAAF Area Command system but suggest that unless there is limited information on that topic, it may well be that each RAAF area command will justify its own article in the fullness of time. Of course that is not to say that an overview article would not also be of benefit. Keep up the good work. Greenshed (talk) 00:17, 12 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Yes, a couple probably could justify their own articles (Eastern Area already has its own because it evolved into the present Air Command) but others like the short-lived Central Area may never have enough meat for that -- we'll see how things look after the umbrella article, eh? Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 01:05, 12 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Cobby St, Campbell, ACT, named after Harry Cobby edit

The streets of the suburb of Campbell, in the Australian Capital Territory, in the vicinity of the Australian War Memorial, are named after Australian military heroes. Cobby St is named after Harry Cobby. It is situated very close to the War Memorial.

I recommend that this information be included in the article. Javaman59 (talk) 01:01, 15 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Done -- tks for letting us know! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 02:01, 15 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Harry Cobby. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:04, 20 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Harry Cobby. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:56, 23 September 2017 (UTC)Reply