This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Latest comment: 12 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
So far as I can tell, the current house - the listed building - is called Hadnock Court House - http://www.coflein.gov.uk/en/site/402652/details/HADNOCK+COURT+HOUSE%2C+NE+OF+MONMOUTH/. In my view, that should be the name of the article, and the focus of the article. We should then go on to explain that it takes its name from a previous house, called Hadnock Court, that was demolished - and say a bit about the history of that house. As written now, the article is very confusing. Ghmyrtle (talk) 11:08, 15 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
PS: I've now attempted to clarify it, and included much of the historical background from the GGAT page. My own view - having done that - is that this article should be renamed Hadnock, and reshaped accordingly. There is much more that an encyclopedia can say about an area, like Hadnock, than can be said about an obscure and relatively unimportant listed building! Ghmyrtle (talk) 14:51, 15 April 2012 (UTC)Reply