Talk:HMS Romney (1762)

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Sturmvogel 66 in topic GA Review
Good articleHMS Romney (1762) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 24, 2010Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 24, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that while in Boston in 1768, sailors and marines from HMS Romney tried to confiscate a merchant vessel belonging to John Hancock?

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Romney (1762)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:39, 24 October 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteriaReply

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    I'm not used to seeing "in Ordinary" capitalized in modern histories.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
    Places of publication for all references would be nice, but not required.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    Is Romney named for anything? Link Captain, Rear-Admiral and Vice-Admiral. Fix the red link in the infobox.
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

Issues fixed. For the name, I presume it's named for the Earl of Romney, but can't find a cite for that. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 23:18, 24 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Quite likely, but as it's unconfirmed...--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:33, 24 October 2010 (UTC)Reply