Talk:HMS Encounter (H10)
HMS Encounter (H10) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 3, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright problem removed
editPrior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.naval-history.net/xGM-Chrono-10DD-21E-Encounter.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:03, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on HMS Encounter (H10). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150715175407/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRcOmYgdp4E to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRcOmYgdp4E
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:09, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Re my edits
editSturmvogel 66, re your asking not to remove links. I agree. However, and please correct me if I am wrong, I have noticed that throughout the page once a ship is first mentioned and linked (to another Wiki page), then when that ship is mentioned again on same page it is not linked, just italicised. So I was just following the formatting I had seen in the article, as in the instance seemingly in question Inazuma had already been linked. KevinVD (talk) 20:24, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
- You are quite correct. My apologies, I overlooked the first link for the destroyer.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:27, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
No 20mm on bridge sides / 'wing's
editIn the 'Description' section on main page it states "Encounter probably also had a pair of QF 20 mm Oerlikon cannons added on the sides of the bridge."
This is incorrect. Video survey evidence of the wreck shows no 20mm on bridge side / wings.
Suggest removing that assumptive statement.
KevinVD (talk) 10:51, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:22, 3 May 2020 (UTC)