Talk:HMS Constant (1801)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the HMS Constant (1801) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from HMS Constant (1801) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 April 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Categories
editI've added the Category:Ships built in Kent. Deptford was in Kent at the time she was built. This should not be changed to London. Mjroots (talk) 19:08, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned references in HMS Constant (1801)
editI check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of HMS Constant (1801)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "Winfield":
- From HMS Carrier (1805): Winfield (2008), p.370.
- From HMS Tartar (1801): Winfield (2008), p.155.
- From HMS Piercer (1804): Winfield (2008), p.340.
- From HMS Lynx (1794): Winfield (2008).
- From HMS Telegraph (1813): Winfield (2008), p. 367.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 11:26, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
- Done - Euryalus (talk) 11:31, 29 March 2016 (UTC)