Talk:Government of Iran

Duplicate article

This appears to be a duplicate article. Most of this content already exists in a more comprehensive article, Politics of Iran. I suggest that any new, sourced content from this article be placed in that article, and then this article should be turned into a redirect. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:10, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

@Jonesey95: The article has notability and is different from the Politics of Iran. It seems that this article is main and the Low-related and unrelated topics of Politics of Iran should be moved here.Homiho (talk) 06:33, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

I disagree with you. There are separate articles for Politics of India and Government of India or Government of the United Kingdom and Politics of the United Kingdom. However, most of the duplicated information should move to one of them.--Seyyed(t-c) 11:03, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

If the consensus is that there should be two articles, then there should be less duplication between the two articles. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:35, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced section has been copied to Talk:Politics of Iran#Merger proposal. Please continue the discussion there, as that is where it will be visible to Wikiproject members. --Stfg (talk) 14:46, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Government of Islamic Republic of Iran. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070821193912/http://farhang.gov.ir/iran-media/psir.htm to http://www.farhang.gov.ir/iran-media/psir.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:35, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Joint Tripartite Meeting of Iranian Government - June 2, 1987.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:32, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• Joint Tripartite Meeting of Iranian Government - June 2, 1987.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:13, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

brian hook

mike pompeo - brian hook & a number of people called iran a kleptocracy marxist totalitarian i added it but it got removed.Baratiiman (talk) 08:08, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

it is also called a kleptocracy.<ref>https://www.aei.org/foreign-and-defense-policy/a-simple-way-to-understand-kleptocracy/</ref><ref>https://editorials.voa.gov/in-support-of-the-iranian-people/5275284.html</ref><ref>https://doublethink.institute/report/bonyad-findings/</ref><ref>https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/fikraforum/view/the-temporary-success-of-irans-proxies-in-lebanon-occludes-a-deeper-shift-i</ref><ref>https://iranprimer.usip.org/blog/2020/jan/17/us-sanctions-senior-iranian-general</ref><ref>https://dw.com/en/iran-faces-protests-international-blowback-after-shooting-down-airliner/a-51970567</ref><ref>https://en.radiofarda.com/a/special-representative-hook-explains-iran-face-sheet-detailing-360-terror-attacks-islamic-republic-/30644249.html</ref> Baratiiman (talk) 08:34, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

@Baratiiman. Hi there, I've declined your request, as it's not completely clear what you want added. Do you want the page to say Iran is a kleptocracy? Or that Pompeo has called it a kleptocracy? Also, where on the page do you want this added? Furthermore, as you used the {{request edit}} template to make this request, which is designed for users with conflicts of interest (COIs), I must ask if you have a COI with the Government of Iran? If so, you must disclose this. Thanks. Seagull123 Φ 16:53, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Pompeo and hook and DW called it. in a new section or whatever section you see it fit.no COI just need help Baratiiman (talk) 17:05, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Seagull123 .Baratiiman (talk) 17:06, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

@Baratiiman: in that case, as you don't have a COI, you should follow the BOLD, revert, discuss cycle, and discuss the issue here with the editor who removed it, as this page isn't protected from editing - in this case, it's @Pahlevun. Seagull123 Φ 17:21, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

@Seagull123: Thank you for pinging me, I was not notified. @Baratiiman: First of all, the sentence you added It has been called a kleptocracy that benefits the governing elite, & marxist totalitarian theocracy, ideocracy because of education in Iran & brain drain in Iran by politicians including Brian Hook is hard to understand. Moreover, this reminds me of when you insisted that "iran is evidently not unicameral" (here) based on synthesizing poor sources that did not support that. You want the article to mention that Iranian regime is kleptocratic, ideocratic or whatever else? Just find a scholarly peer-reviewed source that explicitly says so. Your edit clearly violates WP:SYNTH, let alone WP:RS issues. Pahlevun (talk) 17:50, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Requested move 2 December 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:34, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

---

Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran → Government of Iran – Per WP:CONCISE. Onceinawhile (talk) 14:11, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

• Support per WP:CONCISE and WP:COMMONNAME. Rreagan007 (talk) 17:03, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
• Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 20:02, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
• Support per nom. Shwcz (talk) 12:32, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Human rights violations

Several editors have repeatedly added a section named Human Rights Violations containing the downing of Ukrainian international airlines flight and Irans 2019-2020 protests. I do not think this is relavent to the subject as the page subject is the form of governemnt of Iran and other pages about countries with dubious human rights record (e.g. Government of China or Government of North Korea) do not mention this AlexBobCharles (talk) 17:32, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

You will find that the Government of North Korea article does mention North Korea's atrocious human rights record and even links to the relevant article. Insanityclown1 (talk) 18:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

But it is only mentioned in 2 lines in a section about the judiciary referencing the north korean government detaining lots of people AlexBobCharles (talk) 11:35, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Because North Korea's human rights violations track record is a mile long... Insanityclown1 (talk) 18:24, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

So is Irans. Judging from the North Korea article , It should only be a small note in another section of article AlexBobCharles (talk) 18:26, 22 April 2024 (UTC)