Talk:Good Together (song)

Latest comment: 2 years ago by No such user in topic Requested move 20 July 2021

Requested move 22 February 2021 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requesting to move this page to the “Good Together” page, and make that current page a disambiguation page. This “Good Together” is the only current “Good Together” that actually has a proper page for itself. There is no need to differentiate so long as there are no other “Good Together” pages. Yeehaw45 (talk) 22:45, 22 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

If you are creating a new page with different content, please continue. If you are recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page, or are unsure, please first contact the user(s) who performed the action(s) listed below.
15:58, 6 September 2020 @JJMC89: talk contribs deleted page Good Together (album) (R2: Cross-namespace redirect from mainspace) Tag: Twinkle (thank)
10:14, 5 September 2020 @Mccapra: talk contribs moved page Good Together (album) to Draft:Good Together (album) (Undersourced, incubate in draftspace (via script)) (revert) (thank)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Blanked album restored per above edit

https://pageviews.toolforge.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&range=all-time&pages=Good_Together_(James_Barker_Band_song)%7CGood_Together_(album)

Requested move 20 July 2021 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Good Together (song) per WP:SONGDAB. No such user (talk) 10:31, 23 August 2021 (UTC)Reply


- I am requesting to move this page to "Good Together (song)" with no name disambiguation. As per. WP:SONGDAB, "unless more than one article about songs of the same name exist, there is no need to disambiguate any further." Thus, this page should be able to move there are no other proper articles for other songs titled "Good Together". -Yeehaw45 (talk) 14:46, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • All but 1 of the other entries is a song so I'd move to the base name but there was apparently consensus against that due to the album so I'd probably support this and see what's done with the album before moving to the base name. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:53, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • No.6 on the Canada Country chart? Seriously? Does this song justify an article? ...... the other songs on Good Together dab page by Honne and Shy Martin come up on YouTube and Google, James Barjer Band doesn't. While Good Together (album) gets hits in GBooks. Merge to James Barker Band album? In ictu oculi (talk)
Incidentally, the album (which got much higher page views than this song) was draftspaced and the restoration (per previous RM) was never done till just now, by me. It has greater long term significance than this song, more book hits, and higher page views. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:45, 21 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
I'm pretty sure the most-played domestic song on Canadian country radio for 2018 which is also gold-certified does merit an article. If I search up “Good Together” on YouTube, the James Barker Band song is the first result. I get the same result on Google as well. I only proposed moving it to “Good Together (song)” this time too, to be clear. -Yeehaw45 (talk) 14:00, 21 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
I suppose the different results are due to cookies. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:30, 23 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.