Talk:Goh Keng Swee
 | Goh Keng Swee was a History good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on October 6, 2018. | |||||||||
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alumni of Raffles College/National University of Singapore alumni edit
Hi, Good Olfactory. I don't think it is right to remove Goh Keng Swee from "Category:Alumni of Raffles College" and place him in "Category:National University of Singapore alumni". NUS is the successor of Raffles College, but it was only formed in 1980 and Goh clearly did not study in that institution. Could you please revert the change? Thanks. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 07:38, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- When there is a defunct university and a successor university, category-wise we only have the categories for the successor university. That's the standard convention. An exception would only be made if there was a separate article about Raffles College, which there is not. Good Ol’factory (talk) 07:56, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Really? I'm surprised. Is there a guideline or policy on this? — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 09:10, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Probably not—at least not that I know of. What I said is based on my experience at WP:CFD when categories of this type come up for discussion. As I remember it, invariably the decision has been to use only the current-institution category rather than having one for the current one and the ones that were succeeded. Perhaps this one could be nominated and users could say what they think. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:34, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
- Really? I'm surprised. Is there a guideline or policy on this? — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 09:10, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Goh Keng Swee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110410180550/http://libguides.nl.sg/gohkengswee to http://libguides.nl.sg/gohkengswee
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:12, 20 October 2017 (UTC)