Talk:Gilberto Gil

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Fayenatic london in topic Publications, and sources
Good articleGilberto Gil has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 4, 2008Good article nomineeListed
April 8, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
May 18, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Good article

older entries edit

Anyone with some knowledge about

http://www.emusica.ufrn.br

Is Giblerto Gil institutionally linked to them??

GAN passed edit

Bah...after having reviewed this one at peer review (and Laser brain too!), it's easily a GA. Some minor things I noticed;

  • "The style of Gilberto Gil's music" - keep naming consistent ("Gil")
  • "increasingly interested in black culture" - maybe it's me but I'm not sure what this refers to

But yeah, pretty darn good. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 10:20, 4 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Collaboration edit

Having withdrawn the previous featured article candidacy for this article per the recommendation of Jbmurray (talk · contribs), I'd like to begin a collaboration process here to centralize improvement efforts before the next FAC. The main concerns noted in the recently archived FAC were prose comprehensiveness and quality. Acer (talk · contribs) is working on getting information from Portuguese-language resources, and I have some more information from my English references to add. I'd like to ask for some more specific feedback on what areas are lacking comprehensiveness to facilitate the process of adding my stuff and what Acer's got. Speaking to prose quality, essentially the best thing (IMHO) is just to get as many uninvolved copy editors and MoS experts to look it over as possible. (If only Tony did copy edits…oh, what a world that would be.) Perhaps another peer review would be useful? I welcome responses, if only to find out if anyone's watchlisted other than Jb… (: --Kakofonous (talk) 03:53, 24 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

This sounds like a good plan. I absolutely have this article watchlisted, and propose to come help copy-edit (and recruit other FA-Team members if possible) once you guys have added sources and info, or indeed whenever you think it would be helpful. I would love to read up more about Gil myself--Brazilian culture is definitely something I should know more about--but doubt I have the time. So I look forward to learning from you guys!  :) --jbmurray (talkcontribs) 04:30, 24 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
OK, great! --Kakofonous (talk) 00:36, 25 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
I'll take a look at this as well. It looks like a fairly strong article. Nousernamesleftcopper, not wood 20:11, 26 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Here's something: The lead doesn't really summarize the whole article very comprehensively - the lead should contain a condensed version of essentially everything in the article. For example, it doesn't say anything about his style or influences, yet a lengthy section in the article talks about it. Nousernamesleftcopper, not wood 02:03, 28 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Looks good. Sorry for the confusion in the lead. Nousernamesleftcopper, not wood 02:38, 28 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Lucky to be online at the same time, eh? --Kakofonous (talk) 02:40, 28 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Sorry I've been neglectful recently. I've had my hands full elsewhere. Heh, K, I notice you've been semi-stalking me (in the nicest possible way) by editing many of the same articles I have... I definitely owe you something.

So I've just done some brief copy-editing. Much more could be done. But for now let me note that I think that the article's rather thin on Gil's musical career during the 1960s. Put it this way: the lead mentions Tropicalia and MPB, but the article doesn't. Nor does it talk about bossa nova. These really should be covered.

As I've said before, I would love to be able to help out with the research; this is a topic I should know more about. But I doubt I have time. But I will come back periodically for copy-editing and to offer whatever other comments I can. --jbmurray (talkcontribs) 09:32, 31 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

With the aid of an excellent new source, I think I've addressed (at least some) of your concerns with respect to being comprehensive about Tropicália (diff). The Portuguese-language sources are, at least for the moment, unavailable, as Acer seems to have gone on wikibreak. Are there still issues preventing Gil (or Gilly as Nousernamesleft likes to call him) from going FA? --Kakofonous (talk) 23:50, 25 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
I'm travelling right now, so can't do much; this is mostly a placeholder to say that as far as I'm concerned Gil has not been forgotten! Will be returning in a week or so. Sorry to see that Acer is also on a break: have you pinged him directly? --jbmurray (talkcontribs) 09:38, 26 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
I still think this is the wrong infobox for a musician. --leahtwosaints (talk) 17:17, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Resignation edit

Gil has resigned his post as minister. [1] --SasiSasi (talk) 09:23, 31 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wrong infobox edit

I think a musician's biography infobox is more appropriate here.--leahtwosaints (talk) 06:55, 5 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Birth date edit

Here are some sources stating his birth date as 29 June 1942: http://www.answers.com/topic/gilberto-gil, http://latinmusic.about.com/od/artistsen/p/PROGILBERTOGIL.htm. Hoverfish Talk 13:56, 22 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit request edit

In 2012, Gilberto Gil was invited to serve as a mentor for the Rolex Mentor and Protégé Arts Initiative, an international philanthropic programme that pairs masters in their disciplines with emerging talents for a year of one-to-one creative exchange. Out of a very gifted field of candidates, Gil chose young Egyptian Dina El Wedidi as his protégée.[1] RMP2014 (talk) 15:49, 14 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

References

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Gilberto Gil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:51, 16 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gilberto Gil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:49, 6 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Publications, and sources edit

Please would an interested editor review the abandoned user page User:Timathom/Gilberto Gil, incorporate whatever is useful into the article, and then blank the user page with {{inactive userpage blanked}}? – Fayenatic London 15:40, 3 May 2019 (UTC)Reply