Talk:German submarine U-42 (1939)
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the German submarine U-42 (1939) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | German submarine U-42 (1939) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
 | German submarine U-42 (1939) is part of the German Type IXA submarines series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 20, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that U-42 was the fifth German U-boat to be sunk in World War II? | ||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | |||||||||||||
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
AA Guns edit
Do you know how many AA guns there were? Diannaa TALK 01:42, 19 April 2010 (UTC) In the info box it says "likely to be"; I am taking it out under the assumption you have an answer and a cite. Diannaa TALK 01:45, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah. I do, It's in the existing citaiton.--White Shadows you're breaking up 01:49, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
- How many guns? Just add it to the article when you know. Diannaa TALK 02:10, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
- U-43 passed without this info, BTW, so I guess it is OK without the info :). Sorry if the above post seemed a little pushy. I was just impatient for an answer Diannaa TALK 01:37, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- No prob.--White Shadows you're breaking up 01:43, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- U-43 passed without this info, BTW, so I guess it is OK without the info :). Sorry if the above post seemed a little pushy. I was just impatient for an answer Diannaa TALK 01:37, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- How many guns? Just add it to the article when you know. Diannaa TALK 02:10, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
U-42/U-44? edit
The text seems to alternate between U-42 and U-44. It doesn't seem to be vandalism so is this just an editing error or did I not read it carefully enough and it was renamed? Oh, and one mention of U-41 too, in the opening section. I originally took that as a reference to an earlier boat but think it might be another mistake? sjwk (talk) 07:47, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
GA Review edit
- This review is transcluded from Talk:German submarine U-42 (1939)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 18:57, 2 May 2010 (UTC) Hi, I have reviewed this article. It is well written and presents the (sparse) information clearly. I added a few links to orient myself as well as for others who may not be completely familiar with a war that happened before they were born. Well, referenced; they check out. I can only wish there were a map, such as appears in one of the references, showing where this submarine went.
Xtzou (Talk) 18:57, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
Clear and concise writing
- B. MoS compliance: Complies with the basic MoS
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects: Sets the context
- B. Focused: } Remains focused on topic
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail: Pass!
- Pass or Fail: Pass!
