Talk:George Keith, 10th Earl Marischal
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Claude J in topic Wrong Lemma
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
.svg)
.svg){kind=small}
.svg)
[Untitled] edit
How come that a titel that was attained 1715 and later regranted 1759 are forfeited when its still living decendants to the first earl Marischal
Wrong Lemma edit
According to Cracrofts Peerage he was the 9th Earl Marischal, there is no 10th (in the older literature there was a mistake, see the end of the article Earl Marischal). This has also to be corrected in wikidata.--Claude J (talk) 15:40, 16 October 2019 (UTC)