Talk:Geoff Jenkins

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Career edit

Info on his career needs to be expanded. Players who have been in the league as long as Jenkins have a much more expansive article. Miles Blues 20:43, 1 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

I give up= edit

I am trying my hardest to get all of the 2008 Phillies, the World Series Champions' wiki entries up to standards, but I can't do it alone.

Someone please help me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Squonk64 (talkcontribs) 02:11, 1 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

July 31st HR edit

This article needs to be expanded, and a walk-off HR is not a common occurrence, and deserves mention, which is why I edited into the article. Miles Blues 20:45, 1 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

I agree that the article needs to be expanded, but not with what amounts to little more than trivia. With all due respect, a walk-off home run is not a big deal. Is this event something that the reader will care about in a month? A year? Ten years? The answer to all three, I think, is no. If they were a big deal, then the other ones he has hit would have already been mentioned in the article. That they are not speaks volumes about the purported notability of these events. This is one hit in one regular season game, not Kirk Gibson hitting a walk off in the World Series. --Beaker342 22:08, 1 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
No, it's not the Gibson HR, but if there's a couple highlights from each season, that'd be appropriate. Miles Blues 03:23, 2 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
That may be appropriate if done correctly, but right now it seems woefully out of place. The carrer section reads as a short narrative of significant career events: first at bat, All Star appearance, horrific injury, and demotion. The HR reference at the end doesn't fit that narrative because it doesn't fit the wide-angle perspective of that narrative. I'm taking it out until a more balanced solution can be found. Just like you, I'm concerned about the quality of the article, but I don't feel the information added increases its quality. --Beaker342 14:01, 2 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
I agree that it's out of place... but we can either keep the article in its sorry state, or try to start somewhere to improve it. Miles Blues 14:47, 2 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
can we get a frickin face shot? Ass shots are useless. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.70.219.101 (talk) 01:58, 13 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Geoff Jenkins. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:33, 13 October 2017 (UTC)Reply