A fact from Gary Varner appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 December 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the philosopher Gary Varner has argued that all beings, including plants, have morally considerable interests?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animal rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of animal rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Animal rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Animal rightsTemplate:WikiProject Animal rightsAnimal rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
In general, very good. There is nothing here that I can see as an impediment to GA status. There are a few points perhaps worthy of a little discussion, however:
"(Oxford, 1998)" and "(Oxford, 2012" - this does not appear to contravene any Wikipedia regulations, but it is not a common site. Moreover, I am unsure if we should be using "Oxford" as a synonym for OUP; those familiar with scholarly literature (in Britain and maybe other Western countries) will be familiar with such an abbreviation but I doubt more general readers would. Midnightblueowl (talk) 13:38, 17 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
"two-level utilitarianism of R. M. Hare" - Hare has already been introduced in the previous paragraph, so perhaps we could lose the "R. M."? Midnightblueowl (talk) 13:38, 17 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
"biocentrism" - could we get a link? This isn't a word that I am familiar with and thus I suspect that most readers will have the same problem. Midnightblueowl (talk) 13:38, 17 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
It's currently linked at the first mention in the infobox, the lead and the article body; was there somewhere in particular you thought a link would be appropriate? Josh Milburn (talk) 22:42, 18 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
Fair enough. I missed the link in the lede, that's all. Midnightblueowl (talk) 15:35, 19 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
There are no ISBNs or DOIs in the "Cited texts". Not essential, but recommended. Midnightblueowl (talk) 13:42, 17 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
I've added DOIs, ISBNs and some courtesy links where possible to the bibliography and cited texts. Josh Milburn (talk) 15:11, 19 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
Any images that we could use? Maybe of one of the universities that Varner attended? Midnightblueowl (talk) 14:17, 17 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
I've added an image. I'm speaking at a conference put together by Varner in March, so I'll be sure to take a camera. Josh Milburn (talk) 15:22, 19 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
Great work, Josh. I'm happy to promote this one. Midnightblueowl (talk) 15:35, 19 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
