Talk:Foyer (housing model)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Gvacaliuc. Peer reviewers: McCrowBar, T.scott0513.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Interest in enhancing this article

As part of a course participating in Wikiedu, I'm considering improving this article. From what I've taken away from online sources, (see my user page for some scholarly articles on this housing model), while this housing model may not be the most effective in treating all forms of homelessness, there's been active research on it's effectiveness in teenage homelessness. However, the article as it stands barely scratches the surface of all the details of this model. In improving this article, I could add information collected from studies, as well as indicate its general effectiveness or ineffectiveness (based on the studies contents, of course). Gvacaliuc (talk) 15:45, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed Changes

I'm planning on adding extensively to this article. The article currently mentions that this model is being used in the U.K., Australia and a few places here in the United States, but doesn't look at the history or extensive body of research surrounding the efficacy and effect of this housing model. I have a rough outline in my sandbox. —Preceding undated comment added 23:17, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review 1

It looks pretty good so far. I think that right now it could use more sources, and it could be a bit longer. I feel like there's more to the topic that what's already been posted. The flow, however, is pretty good and it overall it looks pretty good! T.scott0513 (talk) 04:40, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Thank you Gvacaliuc!

Thank you for your contribution to this topic that previously has little information about! I am sure it will be helpful and informative to readers looking for information about the topic. I found your writing particularly impressive. The flow of the sentences were fantastic and everything was presented in a very neutral way. Some suggestions I would make is adding more sources and references to the article. It will make the article seem more credible. Additionally, images would be helpful in making the article visually appealing. Again, thank you! McCrowBar (talk) 20:17, 25 October 2018 (UTC)