Talk:Femminiello

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Femminiello. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110515005531/http://faculty.ed.umuc.edu/~jmatthew/naples/femm.html to http://faculty.ed.umuc.edu/~jmatthew/naples/femm.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:12, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

October 2017

Hello, I have altered a sentence to remove some transphobic language from the "Gender Analysis" section of this article. The first paragraph doesn't make much sense and actually contradicts itself (not to mention is grammatically incorrect), so I think that should be removed also. Does everybody agree? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.245.138.58 (talk) 13:28, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

The segment has been removed entirely because it was unsourced and poorly written. However, keep in mind that it's not up to you (or anyone) to project non-neutral political views based on what you think is offensive onto Wikipedia articles, as it contributes nothing to the article and Wikipedia is not a soapbox. sixtynine ^{• speak up •} 14:00, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Writer above was not engaging in soapbox behaviour, but removing offensive comment. The entire section appears unacademic and soapbox to me. As one of several examples, the sentence in the article "a peculiar gender expression, despite a widespread sexual binarism" refers to the greater, umbrella category of trans*, rather than "transsexual", which is generally viewed as a sub-group of the above umbrella group. And also, it would appear that the differentiation in the article is between local transgender people and immigrants trangender groups, rather than transgender and non-transgender groups. Add to that that we should have a lot more than one (or even two) sensationalistic tabloid articles.

I vote that the entire section be removed and re-written in a more balanced, academic manner, with adequate sources, not a one-off tabloid article and a blog entry based on the same. ~~PPCG~~

Image removed

I've removed this image from the article because it does not depict a Neapolitan femminiello – it's a picture of Dina Alma de Paradeda, a trans woman from Brazil, and it was merely taken in Naples, according to the description. --CRYptex talk 20:22, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Drag queens?

Since the article mentions that defining Femminielli as transgender is reductive, would a comparison to drag queens be more apt and accurate? Especially given the context of taking part in rituals and ceremonies, it does indicate to me that there's a sort of performative aspect to Femminielli that does resemble drag performances. ProbablyPardos (talk) 21:06, 11 April 2023 (UTC)