Talk:Fairview Training Center

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Tedder in topic Refs for expansion

Resources edit

The long, strange and sometimes disturbing history of this facility motivates me to get an article started. Here are some quick online resources I have found:

--Trashbag (talk) 16:35, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hospital edit

Should this really be called a hospital? Especially a psychiatric hospital? It may have been such at first, but by 2000, developmental disabilities would not be equated with mental illness. Wouldn't it be more properly considered a school? I haven't looked closely at the available categories. Katr67 (talk) 17:26, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Good question, if anything it did have a hospital or clinic on site.--Trashbag (talk) 18:10, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
If anything by the 1950's it was going by the name "Fairview Hospital and Training Center." So it was going under that guise for quite a while. --Trashbag (talk) 18:18, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Cottage industries trivia edit

My mom worked a rotation here and at the OSH when she was in nurse's training. I have some linen placemats she made from linen cloth manufactured by the students at Fairview--apparently one of their cottage industries was a weaving shop. I've tried to follow up on learning more about this and never got very far. This was in the mid 1950s. Since Fairview was once like its own little town, this is one of the many details that should be added to the article eventually. Katr67 (talk) 17:26, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Refs for expansion edit

Katr67 (talk) 18:33, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

  • Humphrey, Dick (July 24, 1959). "Progress made in treating Oregon's mentally retarded". The Bulletin.
Series of article reprints (great stuff!)

Probably should go ahead and link this in els pending use as refs...

Katr67 (talk) 22:03, 28 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Many things about Fairview programs:

tedder (talk) 22:14, 28 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Destruction by fire -- January 27th, 2010 edit

http://salem-news.com/articles/january272010/fire.php --24.20.129.18 (talk) 07:08, 28 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

AM--They outsource that now. Anyway, to the anon, it was only one building--"Fairview", or what's left of it, is more than one building. Might be worth a mention in the article, though if the building were torn down in the course of redevelopment it likely wouldn't. I can't tell but I don't think it's one of the historic buildings. Encyclopedia-worthiness of this is a tossup. Katr67 (talk) 15:56, 28 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
I added a reference to which cottage burned in the article. KGW mentioned the cottage by name twice this morning on air. Unfortunately they only have the video from last night up on their website... --Trashbag (talk) 16:39, 28 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Cool, thanks! Katr67 (talk) 17:11, 28 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Huh, KGW also mentioned this article. Don't they have any idea who writes these things? ;) Katr67 (talk) 17:15, 28 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
According to KGW: "The building was described on the public-source website Wikipedia as a former home to the developmentally disabled before housing Oregon Insane Asylum inmates." Um, does it say that? Katr67 (talk) 17:21, 28 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Apparently we screen our stuff better then they do ;-D --Trashbag (talk) 18:28, 28 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
It's a somewhat Ouroboros-like moment. Surreal. Too bad these places don't have a staff of nitpicky editors like we do! tedder (talk) 18:50, 28 January 2010 (UTC)Reply