Wikipedia:WikiProject Hospitals/Assessment

 About Talk Participants Tutorials Maintenance Articles Assessments Popular pages 

Hospital articles by quality and importance
Quality	Importance
	Top	High	Mid	Low	NA	???	Total
GA		2	8	7		1	18
B	4	35	47	86		20	192
C	7	90	308	398		73	876
Start	6	120	1,101	2,244		296	3,767
Stub		42	551	2,221	1	501	3,316
List	106	63	38	93	4	4	308
Category					2,383		2,383
Disambig					110		110
File					74		74
Project					8		8
Redirect	89	3	29	71	329		521
Template					281		281
Other					56		56
Assessed	212	355	2,082	5,120	3,246	895	11,910
Unassessed				9		162	171
Total	212	355	2,082	5,129	3,246	1,057	12,081
WikiWork factors (?)		ω = 42,847			Ω = 5.25

Welcome to the assessment department of WikiProject Hospitals! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Hospital articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

Category:Hospital articles by quality serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist that is updated daily. The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Hospitals}} project banner. Filling in a rating in the class parameter of the {{WikiProject Hospitals}} template on the talk page of an article causes the name of that article to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Hospital articles by quality.

Frequently asked questions

How can I get my article rated?

First, make sure that the article is actually within the scope of the project (see below). If it is, you can list it in the requesting an assessment section below.

Who can assess articles?

Any member of WikiProject Hospitals is free to add—or change—the rating of an article, but please follow the guidelines.

Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?

Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.

Where can I get more comments about my article?

Contact WikiProject Hospitals who will handle it or assign the issue to someone.

What if I don't agree with a rating?

Relist it as a request or contact the project.

Aren't the ratings subjective?

Yes, they are (see, in particular, the disclaimers on the importance scale), but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask on the discussion page for this department, or to contact the WikiProject Hospitals directly.

Project template

The template banner, {{WikiProject Hospitals |class = |importance = |attention = |needs-infobox = |needs-photo = |needs-coord = }} is added to the talk pages of Hospital articles and gives:

• Full details at {{WikiProject Hospitals}}.

Instructions

An article's quality assessment is recorded using the |class= parameter in the {{WikiProject banner shell}}. Articles that have the {{WikiProject Hospitals}} banner template on their talk page will be added to the appropriate categories by quality.

The following standard grades may be used to describe the quality of mainspace articles (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):

FA	(for featured articles only; adds them to the FA-Class Hospital articles category)		FA
FL	(for featured lists only; adds them to the FL-Class Hospital articles category)		FL
A	(for articles that passed a formal peer review only; adds them to the A-Class Hospital articles category)		A
GA	(for good articles only; adds them to the GA-Class Hospital articles category)		GA
B	(for articles that satisfy all of the B-Class criteria; adds them to the B-Class Hospital articles category)		B
C	(for substantial articles; adds them to the C-Class Hospital articles category)		C
Start	(for developing articles; adds them to the Start-Class Hospital articles category)		Start
Stub	(for basic articles; adds them to the Stub-Class Hospital articles category)		Stub
List	(for stand-alone lists; adds them to the List-Class Hospital articles category)		List
NA	(for any other pages where assessment is unwarranted; adds them to the NA-Class Hospital pages category)		NA
???	(articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in the Unassessed Hospital articles category)		???

For non-mainspace content, the following values may be used:

Category	(for categories; adds them to the Category-Class Hospital pages category)		Category
Draft	(for drafts; adds them to the Draft-Class Hospital pages category)		Draft
File	(for files and timed text; adds them to the File-Class Hospital pages category)		File
Portal	(for portal pages; adds them to the Portal-Class Hospital pages category)		Portal
Project	(for project pages; adds them to the Project-Class Hospital pages category)		Project
Template	(for templates and modules; adds them to the Template-Class Hospital pages category)		Template

The following non-standard assessment grades for mainspace content may be used at a WikiProject's discretion:

Disambig	(for disambiguation pages; adds them to the Disambig-Class Hospital pages category)		Disambig
Redirect	(for redirect pages; adds them to the Redirect-Class Hospital pages category)		Redirect

---

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Hospitals}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Hospitals|importance=???}}

The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):

Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Hospital articles)		Top
High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Hospital articles)		High
Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Hospital articles)		Mid
Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Hospital articles)		Low
NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance Hospital articles)		NA
??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Hospital articles)		???

Quality scale

WikiProject content quality grading scheme

Class	Criteria	Reader's experience	Editing suggestions	Example
FA	The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured article criteria: A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes. It is: well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard; comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context; well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate; neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias; stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of: a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections; appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style where appropriate.	Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.	Fantome Island Lock Hospital and Lazaret Sites
FL	The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured list criteria: Prose. It features professional standards of writing. Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria. Comprehensiveness. (a) It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing at least all of the major items and, where practical, a complete set of items; where appropriate, it has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about the items. (b) statements are sourced where they appear, and they provide inline citations if they contain any of the four kinds of material absolutely required to have citations. (c) In length and/or topic, it meets all of the requirements for stand-alone lists and includes at minimum eight items; does not violate the content-forking guideline, does not largely duplicate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages. (a) Visual appeal. It makes suitable use of text layout, formatting, tables, and colour; and a minimal proportion of items are redlinked. (b) Media files. It has images and other media, if appropriate to the topic, that follow Wikipedia's usage policies, with succinct captions. Non-free images and other media satisfy the criteria for the inclusion of non-free content and are labeled accordingly. (c) Accessibility. It uses proper formating to be accessible to all readers. Bulleted and unbulleted lists and tables are structured correctly. Visual media, if included, utilize alternative (alt) text. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.	Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.	none
A	The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria The article meets the A-Class criteria: Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history).	Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting.	Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help.	none
GA	The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria A good article is: Well-written: the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Verifiable with no original research: it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline; reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose); it contains no original research; and it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. Broad in its coverage: it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication.	Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing.	Endell Street Military Hospital
B	The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but does not need to be of the standard of featured articles. The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.	Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher.	A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines.	Bethlem Royal Hospital
C	The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.	Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study.	Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems.	Mayo Clinic Hospital (Rochester)
Start	An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following: A useful picture or graphic Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article	Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more.	Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Improve the grammar, spelling, and writing style; decrease the use of jargon.	UCSF Medical Center
Stub	A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria.	Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant.	Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant.	Baton Rouge General Medical Center – Bluebonnet Campus
List	Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area.	There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader.	Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized.	List of hospitals in Algeria
Category	Any category falls under this class.	Categories are mainly used to group together articles within a particular subject area.	Large categories may need to be split into one or more subcategories. Be wary of articles that have been miscategorized.	Category:Hospitals
Disambig	Any disambiguation page falls under this class.	The page serves to distinguish multiple articles that share the same (or similar) title.	Additions should be made as new articles of that name are created. Pay close attention to the proper naming of such pages, as they often do not need "(disambiguation)" appended to the title.	Baptist Hospital
File	Any page in the file namespace falls under this class.	The page contains an image, a sound clip or other media-related content.	Make sure that the file is properly licensed and credited.	File:Ellis Island hospital (01849).jpg
Project	All WikiProject-related pages fall under this class.	Project pages are intended to aid editors in article development.	Develop these pages into collaborative resources that are useful for improving articles within the project.	Wikipedia:WikiProject Hospitals/Tutorials
Redirect	Any redirect falls under this class.	The page redirects to another article with a similar name, related topic or that has been merged with the original article at this location.	Editor involvement is essential to ensure that articles are not mis-classified as redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles.	AdventHealth East Orlando]
Template	Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates include infoboxes and navboxes.	Different types of templates serve different purposes. Infoboxes provide easy access to key pieces of information about the subject. Navboxes are for the purpose of grouping together related subjects into an easily accessible format, to assist the user in navigating between articles.	Infoboxes are typically placed at the upper right of an article, while navboxes normally go across the very bottom of a page. Beware of too many different templates, as well as templates that give either too little, too much, or too specialized information.	template:Hospital articles
NA	Any non-article page that fits no other classification.	The page contains no article content.	Look out for misclassified articles. Currently, many NA-class articles may need to be re-classified.	Maintained
???	Article quality has not yet been assessed.	Articles for which a valid quality rating has not yet been provided are listed in this category.	A quality parameter should be assigned according to the assessment department of the WikiProject.	Maintained

Importance scale

WikiProject article importance scheme

Importance	Criteria	Example
Top	Hospitals of extreme significance and that are internationally renowned. This could include Hospitals with outstanding features (such as the largest or tallest in the world), or Hospitals of major historical or present-day significance. Also included are List of hospitals for Continents/Countries.	Johns Hopkins Hospital Mayo Clinic List of hospitals in the United States List of hospitals in Italy List of hospitals in Japan List of hospitals in England Lists of hospitals in North America
High	Hospitals of major significance particularly within a specific country, region or city. This could include hospitals that exhibit new medical innovations, or have extreme costs, or are well publicized internationally for their positive or negative achievements. Also included are List of hospitals in Administrative Subdivisions of Countries, such as Minnesota, Virginia, etc.	Great Ormond Street Hospital List of hospitals in Minnesota List of trauma centers in the United States
Mid	Hospitals of average significance within a country, region, or city.	Bristol Royal Infirmary Boston City Hospital
Low	Hospitals of minor or local significance.	Bayshore Community Hospital Buffalo Hospital Glencoe Regional Health Services
NA	Subject importance is not applicable. Generally applies to non-article pages such as redirects, categories, templates, etc.	Category:Hospitals
???	Unassessed, importance still to be determined. Should be update weekly or daily.

Requesting an assessment or re-assessment

List your request for an assessment or re-assessment here:

• South Glasgow University Hospital - One of the largest hospital campus areas in Europe and of significant interest in the UK. GRA (talk) 12:20, 30 June 2015 (UTC) Now C-class. Someone needs to nominate for GA, if they think it is worthy. G. Moore 12:36, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
• Indian hospital - Request re-assessment (and some suggestions for further improvement, please!) Allanaaaaaaa (talk) 16:45, 9 November 2017 (UTC) Now rated C-class. A GA nomination would help to identify deficiencies. G. Moore 13:11, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
• Lagos University Teaching Hospital- request of re-assessment and other suggestions of improvement please! Creatorhj244 (talk) 23:44, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
• Anderson Regional Medical Center - requesting re-assessment. Feel it could at least be a B-class from start? Dofftoubab (talk) 23:25, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
• Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital - Request reassessment. Historical significance and leader in neuroscience research. Newfoundlandguy (talk) 22:18, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Summary statistics with live links

As of 21 June 2025, there are 8,648 articles within the scope of WikiProject Hospital, of which 0 are featured and 18 are good articles. This makes up 0.12% of the articles on Wikipedia, 0% of all featured articles and lists, and 0.04% of all good articles. Including non-article pages, such as talk pages, redirects, categories, etc., there are 24,268 pages in the project.

Most popular WikiProject Hospitals articles: Wikipedia:WikiProject Hospitals/Popular pages (updated monthly, starting in May 2020)

Project Hospitals Statistics (Statistics automatically update (), See also Wikipedia:Content assessment)

Project Hospitals articles by Importance Sample Talk Page: {{WikiProject Hospitals|class=B|importance=Low}} Importance Description Category Link # of Articles Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Hospital articles) Top 212 High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Hospital articles) High 355 Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Hospital articles) Mid 2,082 Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Hospital articles) Low 5,129 NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance Hospital articles) NA 0 ??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Hospital articles) ??? 1,057 Total in all above importance categories (Category:Hospital articles by importance) Total 8,648

Project Hospitals articles by Wikipedia:Class Sample Talk Page: {{WikiProject Hospitals |class=B|importance=Low}} Class Description Category Link # of articles FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Hospital articles) Featured article FA 0 A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Hospital articles) A-Class article A 0 GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Hospital articles) GA GA 18 B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Hospital articles) B B 192 C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Hospital articles) C C 877 Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Hospital articles) Start Start 3,767 Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Hospital articles) Stub Stub 3,316 FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Hospital articles) Featured list FL FL 0 List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Hospital articles) List List 308 Future (for articles about future events; adds articles to Category:Future-Class Hospital articles) Future Future 0 Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class Hospital articles) Category 0 Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Hospital articles) Disambig 0 Draft (for draft pages; adds pages to Category:Draft-Class Hospital articles) Draft 0 FM (for files; adds pages to Category:FM-Class Hospital articles) FM 0 File (for files and timed text; adds pages to Category:File-Class Hospital articles) File 0 Redirect (for Redirect pages; adds pages to Category:Redirect-Class Hospital articles) Redirect 0 Portal (for Portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class Hospital articles) Portal 0 Project (for WP:Project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class Hospital articles) Project 0 Template (for templates and modules; adds pages to Category:Template-Class Hospital articles) Template 0 NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Hospital articles) NA 0 Unassessed (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Hospital articles) Unassessed 170 Total of all Classes above 8,648

Assessment log

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

This log records all changes since the last run. Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold. The maximum size of the log file is approximately 100,000 bytes. Daily changes will be appended to the log until it reaches 100k, at which point the oldest entries will be overwritten. If the current run will be larger than 100k, it will split the update into multiple parts, and the next day's log will start from scratch.

The raw log can be viewed here :Wikipedia:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Hospital_articles_by_quality_log, along with a historical record of ALL updates. To run an update manually, click here.

June 21, 2025

Reassessed

• Keio University Hospital (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• 2025 Soroka hospital attack (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• Draft:MAA HOSPITALS (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Draft:Narendra Choudhary (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Southland Hospital (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)

June 20, 2025

Assessed

• Clalit Health Services (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)

Removed

• Category:Boston State Hospital patients (talk) removed.

June 19, 2025

Renamed

• Victoriano Luna General Hospital renamed to V. Luna General Hospital.

Assessed

• AdventHealth Ottawa (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
• Draft:Kimball Health Services (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• V. Luna General Hospital (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Mid-Class. (rev · t)

June 17, 2025

Reassessed

• Lanka Hospitals (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)

Removed

• Draft:Max Med Centre Services Lajpat Nagar (talk) removed.
• Draft:Ribon (talk) removed.

June 16, 2025

Renamed

• St. Luke's Hospital (Chicago, Illinois) renamed to St. Luke's Hospital Complex (Chicago).

Assessed

• Category:Attacks on hospitals during the Gaza war (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• St. Luke's Hospital Complex (Chicago) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)

Removed

• Category:Attacks on hospitals during the Israel–Hamas war (talk) removed.
• Draft:Rajendra Bhaiya Prajapati (talk) removed.

June 15, 2025

Renamed

• Nebraska Orthopaedic Hospital renamed to OrthoNebraska.

Reassessed

• Japanese Hospital (Rota) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• OrthoNebraska (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)