Wikipedia:WikiProject Hospitals/Assessment

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Hospitals
 About Talk Participants Tutorials Maintenance Articles Assessments Popular pages 
Hospital articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA Total
Featured article FA 1 1
GA 1 8 7 16
B 2 17 30 49 98
C 4 74 260 275 613
Start 6 114 1,082 1,866 3,068
Stub 1 47 646 2,143 2,837
List 107 61 38 98 304
Category 1,592 1,592
Disambig 113 113
File 1 14 15
Project 13 13
Redirect 90 1 2 189 282
Template 1 1 197 199
Other 1 14 15
Assessed 210 317 2,065 4,442 2,132 9,166
Total 210 317 2,065 4,442 2,132 9,166
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 35,156 Ω = 5.30

Welcome to the assessment department of WikiProject Hospitals! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Hospital articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

Category:Hospital articles by quality serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist that is updated daily. The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Hospitals}} project banner. Filling in a rating in the class parameter of the {{WikiProject Hospitals}} template on the talk page of an article causes the name of that article to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Hospital articles by quality.

Frequently asked questionsEdit

How can I get my article rated?
First, make sure that the article is actually within the scope of the project (see below). If it is, you can list it in the requesting an assessment section below.
Who can assess articles?
Any member of WikiProject Hospitals is free to add—or change—the rating of an article, but please follow the guidelines.
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
Where can I get more comments about my article?
Contact WikiProject Hospitals who will handle it or assign the issue to someone.
What if I don't agree with a rating?
Relist it as a request or contact the project.
Aren't the ratings subjective?
Yes, they are (see, in particular, the disclaimers on the importance scale), but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask on the discussion page for this department, or to contact the WikiProject Hospitals directly.

Project templateEdit

The template banner, {{WikiProject Hospitals |class = |importance = |attention = |needs-infobox = |needs-photo = |needs-coord = }} is added to the talk pages of Hospital articles and gives:

WikiProject Hospitals (Rated Project-class)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hospitals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hospitals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
  Project  This article has been rated as Project-Class on the project's quality scale.
 
This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
 
This page has been marked as needing a hospital infobox.
 
This page has been marked as needing an image.
 
This page has been marked as needing geographic coordinates.

InstructionsEdit

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Hospitals}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Hospitals|class=???}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Hospital articles)   FA 
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Hospital articles)   A 
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Hospital articles)   GA 
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Hospital articles)   B 
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Hospital articles)   C 
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Hospital articles)   Start 
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Hospital articles)   Stub 
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Hospital articles)   FL 
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Hospital articles)   List 
Future (for articles about future events; adds articles to Category:Future-Class Hospital articles)   Future 

For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:

Book (for Wikipedia books; adds pages to Category:Book-Class Hospital articles)   Book 
Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class Hospital articles)   Category 
Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Hospital articles)   Disambig 
Draft (for drafts; adds pages to Category:Draft-Class Hospital articles)   Draft 
File (for files and timed text; adds pages to Category:File-Class Hospital articles)   File 
Portal (for portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class Hospital articles)   Portal 
Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class Hospital articles)   Project 
Redirect (for redirect pages; adds pages to Category:Redirect-Class Hospital articles)   Redirect 
Template (for templates and modules; adds pages to Category:Template-Class Hospital articles)   Template 
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Hospital articles)   NA 
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Hospital articles)   ??? 

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Hospitals}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Hospitals|importance=???}}

The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):

Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Hospital articles)  Top 
High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Hospital articles)  High 
Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Hospital articles)  Mid 
Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Hospital articles)  Low 
NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance Hospital articles)  NA 
??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Hospital articles)  ??? 

Quality scaleEdit

WikiProject article quality grading scheme
Class Criteria Reader's experience Editing suggestions Example
  FA  The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:

A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.

  1. It is:
    1. well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard;
    2. comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context;
    3. well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate;
    4. neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias;
    5. stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and
    6. compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing.
  2. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of:
    1. a lead or lede: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
    2. appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and
    3. consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required.
  3. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly.
  4. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style.
 Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. Fantome Island Lock Hospital and Lazaret Sites
  FL  The article has attained featured list status.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
  1. Prose. It features professional standards of writing.
  2. Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria.
  3. Comprehensiveness.
  4. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities.
  5. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages.
  6. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.
 Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available. none
  A  The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history).
 Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. none
  GA  The article has attained good article status, having been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the good article criteria:

A good article is:

  1. Well written:
    1. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
    2. it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
  2. Verifiable with no original research:
    1. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
    2. all inline citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines;
    3. it contains no original research; and
    4. it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.
  3. Broad in its coverage:
    1. it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
    2. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
    1. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
    2. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
 Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (but not equaling) the quality of a professional encyclopedia. Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. Endell Street Military Hospital
  B  The article is mostly complete and without major problems but requires some further work to reach good article standards.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the six B-Class criteria:
  1. The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional.
  2. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
  3. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
  4. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be "brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously.
  5. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
  6. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. Although Wikipedia is more than just a general encyclopedia, the article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.
 Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. Bethlem Royal Hospital
  C  The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains much irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup.
More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements; need editing for clarity, balance, or flow; or contain policy violations, such as bias or original research. Articles on fictional topics are likely to be marked as C-Class if they are written from an in-universe perspective. It is most likely that C-Class articles have a reasonable encyclopedic style.
 Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. Mayo Clinic Hospital (Rochester)
  Start  An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources.
More detailed criteria
The article has a usable amount of good content but is weak in many areas. Quality of the prose may be distinctly unencyclopedic, and Wikipedia:Manual of Style compliance non-existent. The article should satisfy fundamental content policies, such as Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Frequently, the referencing is inadequate, although enough sources are usually provided to establish verifiability. No Start-Class article should be in any danger of being speedily deleted.
 Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. UCSF Medical Center
  Stub  A very basic description of the topic. Can be well-written, but may also have significant content issues.
More detailed criteria
The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to become a meaningful article. It is usually very short; however, if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible, an article of any length falls into this category. Although Stub-class articles are the lowest class of the normal classes, they are adequate enough to be an accepted article, though they do have risks of being dropped from being an article altogether.
 Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. Baton Rouge General Medical Center – Bluebonnet Campus
  List  Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. List of hospitals in Algeria
  Category  Any category falls under this class. Categories are mainly used to group together articles within a particular subject area. Large categories may need to be split into one or more subcategories. Be wary of articles that have been miscategorized. Category:Hospitals
  Disambig  Any disambiguation page falls under this class. The page serves to distinguish multiple articles that share the same (or similar) title. Additions should be made as new articles of that name are created. Pay close attention to the proper naming of such pages, as they often do not need "(disambiguation)" appended to the title. Baptist Hospital
  File  Any page in the file namespace falls under this class. The page contains an image, a sound clip or other media-related content. Make sure that the file is properly licensed and credited. File:Ellis Island hospital (01849).jpg
  Project  All WikiProject-related pages fall under this class. Project pages are intended to aid editors in article development. Develop these pages into collaborative resources that are useful for improving articles within the project. Wikipedia:WikiProject Hospitals/Tutorials
  Redirect  Any redirect falls under this class. The page redirects to another article with a similar name, related topic or that has been merged with the original article at this location. Editor involvement is essential to ensure that articles are not mis-classified as redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. AdventHealth East Orlando]
  Template  Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates include infoboxes and navboxes. Different types of templates serve different purposes. Infoboxes provide easy access to key pieces of information about the subject. Navboxes are for the purpose of grouping together related subjects into an easily accessible format, to assist the user in navigating between articles. Infoboxes are typically placed at the upper right of an article, while navboxes normally go across the very bottom of a page. Beware of too many different templates, as well as templates that give either too little, too much, or too specialized information. template:Hospital articles
  NA  Any non-article page that fits no other classification. The page contains no article content. Look out for misclassified articles. Currently, many NA-class articles may need to be re-classified. Maintained
  ???  Article quality has not yet been assessed. Articles for which a valid quality rating has not yet been provided are listed in this category. A quality parameter should be assigned according to the assessment department of the WikiProject. Maintained

Importance scaleEdit

WikiProject article importance scheme
Importance Criteria Example
 Top Hospitals of extreme significance and that are internationally renowned. This could include Hospitals with outstanding features (such as the largest or tallest in the world), or Hospitals of major historical or present-day significance. Also included are List of hospitals for Continents/Countries.
 High Hospitals of major significance particularly within a specific country, region or city. This could include hospitals that exhibit new medical innovations, or have extreme costs, or are well publicized internationally for their positive or negative achievements. Also included are List of hospitals in Administrative Subdivisions of Countries, such as Minnesota, Virginia, etc.
 Mid Hospitals of average significance within a country, region, or city.
 Low Hospitals of minor or local significance.
 NA Subject importance is not applicable. Generally applies to non-article pages such as redirects, categories, templates, etc. Category:Hospitals
 ??? Unassessed, importance still to be determined. Should be update weekly or daily.


Requesting an assessment or re-assessmentEdit

List your request for an assessment or re-assessment here:

Summary statistics with live linksEdit

As of April 20, 2021, there are 6,941 articles within the scope of WikiProject Hospitals, of which 1 are featured. This makes up 0.11% of the articles on Wikipedia and 0.01% of featured articles and lists. Including non-article pages, such as talk pages, redirects, categories, etcetera, there are 18,340 pages in the project.

Most popular WikiProject Hospitals articles: Wikipedia:WikiProject Hospitals/Popular pages (updated monthly, starting in May 2020)

Project Hospitals Statistics (Statistics automatically update (refresh), See also Wikipedia:Content assessment)
Project Hospitals articles by Importance
Sample Talk Page: {{WikiProject Hospitals|class=B|importance=Low}}
Importance Description Category Link # of Articles
Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Hospital articles) Top 210
High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Hospital articles) High 317
Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Hospital articles) Mid 2,065
Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Hospital articles) Low 4,448
NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance Hospital articles) NA 2,134
??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Hospital articles) ??? 0
Total in all above importance categories (Category:Hospital articles by importance) Total 9,170
Project Hospitals articles by Wikipedia:Class
Sample Talk Page: {{WikiProject Hospitals |class=B|importance=Low}}
Class Description Category Link # of articles
FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Hospital articles) Featured article   FA 1
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Hospital articles) A-Class article   A 0
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Hospital articles) GA   GA 16
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Hospital articles) B B 98
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Hospital articles) C C 613
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Hospital articles) Start Start 3,070
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Hospital articles) Stub Stub 2,839
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Hospital articles) Featured list FL   FL 0
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Hospital articles) List List 304
Future (for articles about future events; adds articles to Category:Future-Class Hospital articles) Future Future 0
Book (for Wikipedia books; adds pages to Category:Book-Class Hospital articles) Book 0
Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class Hospital articles) Category 1,592
Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Hospital articles) Disambig 113
Draft (for draft pages; adds pages to Category:Draft-Class Hospital articles) Draft 16
FM (for files; adds pages to Category:FM-Class Hospital articles)   FM 0
File (for files and timed text; adds pages to Category:File-Class Hospital articles) File 15
Redirect (for Redirect pages; adds pages to Category:Redirect-Class Hospital articles) Redirect 282
Portal (for Portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class Hospital articles) Portal 0
Project (for WP:Project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class Hospital articles) Project 15
Template (for templates and modules; adds pages to Category:Template-Class Hospital articles) Template 212
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Hospital articles) NA 0
Unassessed (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Hospital articles) Unassessed 0
Total of all Classes above 9,170

Assessment logEdit

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

This log records all changes since the last run. Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold. The maximum size of the log file is approximately 100,000 bytes. Daily changes will be appended to the log until it reaches 100k, at which point the oldest entries will be overwritten. If the current run will be larger than 100k, it will split the update into multiple parts, and the next day's log will start from scratch.

The raw log can be viewed here :Wikipedia:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Hospital_articles_by_quality_log, along with a historical record of ALL updates. To run an update manually, click here.

April 20, 2021Edit

RenamedEdit

ReassessedEdit

AssessedEdit

April 19, 2021Edit

AssessedEdit

April 17, 2021Edit

ReassessedEdit

AssessedEdit

April 16, 2021Edit

RenamedEdit

AssessedEdit

April 15, 2021Edit

ReassessedEdit

AssessedEdit

April 14, 2021Edit

RenamedEdit

ReassessedEdit

AssessedEdit

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Hospitals/Assessment&oldid=1007244722"