Talk:Eryx (missile)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

ERYX Broken

edit

This anti-tank missile is broken. Turkey purchased approx 1,200 missile and some of them were not good working.

kızılsungur 22:44, 2 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


Thanks for sharing. Now we can reactivate the 4th, 6th, and 10th armored and send them across the Iraqi border with Turkery! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.239.237.213 (talk) 20:28, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Launch failure video

edit

That video is a hoax. Canadian troops scaring their rookies with dud missiles. You can tell it's a dud because it just falls off after being ejected. It's been commented over and over. I think it should be removed.

--WhiteEcho (talk) 14:31, 5 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Eryx Rejected by Turkish Army

edit

The manufacturer (MBDA France) has signed a contract for 1600 launchers and more than 19000 missiles. But after the delivery of 682 launchers and almost 4000 missiles, MBDA went to International arbitration becuase the Turkish Army didnot want the rest of the Eryx. According to local defence magasine (Savunma ve Havacılık, Mönch Group, No.126), the test results in Karapınar Firing ranch werenot satisfactory and didnot meet the expectations. After that, Kornet-E from Russia is being purchased now to replace. Hakan YILDIZ

The ERYX contract was also canceled over a political dispute between the Turkish government and the French government. --Jackehammond (talk) 22:18, 5 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

.

Correction on how the Eryx actually operates

edit

Folks,

I re-edited the Eryx article, correcting some mistakes. Many of them "fact" that are legit, because they have been repeated over and over and over by sources that should no better. If any one has any questions just leave a message in my talk section. I will gladly answer them. Jackehammond (talk) 06:22, 5 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.army-technology.com/projects/eryx/
    Triggered by \barmy-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 09:23, 3 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 20:15, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on ERYX. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:18, 15 September 2017 (UTC)Reply