Talk:Enrico Dandolo

Untitled

The opening introduction includes '...which he, at age ninety and blind, surreptitiously redirected against the Byzantine Empire...' This implies that Dandalo was responsible for the deviation of the crusade, which is pretty erronious in the context of a debate thats been going on for more than 100 years. See swabian treason/modern theory of accidents. Some neutrality work required? Tiberius (talk) 03:45, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

The article uses Madden 2003 as a source. What? --70.119.12.223 (talk) 03:26, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Haha! I never thought of that. It's not Madden 2003 though, it's a book by Thomas Madden, published in 2003. Adam Bishop (talk) 04:10, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Could somebody please correct this article w.r.t. the ordinal number that Dandalo occupies in the sequence of Venetian Doges? The introduction claims him to be the 41st. Later in the article, he is identified as the thirty-ninth. In a separate page (List_of_Doges_of_Venice), his is the 42nd name on that list. Cupid1889 (talk) 11:39, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

His portrait

I love to see his portrait in the infobox. Which one is good for your eyes? I found this one at the commons.

--Cheol (talk) 01:30, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Messed up the history of this Enrico Dandolo and Enrico Dandolo (patriarch)?

It looks as if these two articles have been messed up. I hope someone will look into it. PerV (talk) 22:01, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Doesn't seems so. What does make you think this?--Phso2 (talk) 07:39, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

English translation of my german version

• Enrico Dandolo --Hans-Jürgen Hübner (talk) 07:33, 14 April 2021 (UTC)