Talk:Dogs Is Dogs

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Comedy

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 26 March 2018 edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago9 comments9 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: consensus to move the page, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 02:04, 2 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Dogs is Dogs → Dogs Is Dogs – A listing of this nature really belongs under "Uncontroversial technical requests" but, since this entry, created by Lugnuts on September 18, 2008 as Dogs Is Dogs, was moved to Dogs is Dogs on November 22, 2008, with the edit summary, "caps", it seemed appropriate, after nearly 10 years, to restore it to original form with a vote. Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 21:03, 26 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Support, per nom. Starring Pete the Pup. Randy Kryn (talk) 22:08, 26 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
Support Uncontroversial, explicitly covered in MOS:CAPTITLE: "Always capitalized... Every verb, including forms of to be (Be, Am, Is, Are, Was, Were, Been)". Sources for the article use the same. -- Netoholic @ 05:03, 27 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
Support per all the above. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 06:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
Support seems very clear cut and uncontroversial. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 12:45, 27 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
Support per MOS:CT. Darkday (talk) 22:13, 27 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
Support move. The rationale for the move ten years ago simply doesn't hold up. ONR (talk) 06:27, 28 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
Support per nom and MOS:CT. Uncontroversial. Paintspot Infez (talk) 19:17, 1 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic