 | This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page: • Publicis Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Publicis |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
no need for an article Light2021 (talk) 21:10, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
- No discussion and user now banned. Removing merge template.--CNMall41 (talk) 23:24, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
- The user was never banned, he was indeffed for violating an editing restriction – not the same thing at all. And now the block is lifted. So that was an erroneous reason to terminate the discussion. I have redirected it as a fatally flawed article based on crud sources (MediaPost, clickz.com, etc.), probably non-notable. Someone will have to reconstruct it with good indications of notability. ☆ Bri (talk) 16:34, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
DigitasLBi now Digitas edit
Publicis Groupe (of which my company SapientRazorfish is a part) has decided to rename DigitasLBi to Digitas. See: https://www.campaignlive.co.uk/article/digitaslbi-rebrands-globally-digitas-bid-form-unified-network/1459176.
I’d do my Wikipedian duties to move these articles around, weren’t it for the potential conflict of interest. So! I bring it up here for the community to make adjustments, as needed. As a hint, maybe this could become Digitas (1980 company)? jareha (comments) 01:32, 19 March 2018 (UTC)